5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2015-03
green
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Standard Inst. in Crim. Cases (No. 2005-3)
green
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Stan. Jury Instr. in Criminal Cases
green
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases
green
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2016-09
neutral
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State of Florida v. S.A., a child
green
1 sentence2018Consistent with our limiting juvenile rule 8.080(c)(10) to "deportation consequences," we have changed item 6(b) "immigration issues" in the new form to "deportation issues." Next, we decline to adopt, at this time, the proposed amendments to rule 8.090(m)(3) that would establish the single 15-day speedy-trial recapture window suggested by Justice Pariente in her concurring opinion in State v. S.A. , 133 So.3d 506 , 509-10 (Fla. 2014) (Pariente J., concurring). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2013-05
green
1 sentence2018This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1989 [ 543 So.2d 1205 ], 1997 [ 697 So.2d 84 ], 2007 [ 969 So.2d 245 ], 2014 [ 153 So.3d 192 ], 2016 [ 191 So.3d 291 ], and 2017 [ 216 So.3d 497 ], and 2018. 1 After the Court's referral to the Committee, the proposal to amend instruction 25.7 was published by the Committee, while the Court published the Committee's proposed amendments to instruction 16.10. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General ex rel. Amendment to Bar Government from Treating People Differently Based on Race in Public Education
green
2 sentences2008In Treating People Differently, the Court found that the ballot titles and summaries, which stated that the proposed amendments would bar the government from treating people differently based on race and end governmental discrimination, were misleading because they falsely implied that no constitutional provision addressing differential treatment existed at that time and that the government was then practicing discrimination. 778 So.2d at 898 . 2008In Treating People Differently, the Court found that the ballot titles and summaries, which stated that the proposed amendments would bar the government from treating people differently based on race and end governmental discrimination, were misleading because they falsely implied that no constitutional provision addressing differential treatment existed at that time and that the government was then practicing discrimination. 778 So.2d at 898 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Florida Bar v. Catalano
neutral
1 sentence1996This amendment is being proposed as a direct result of our decision in Florida Bar v. Catalano, 651 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995), in which we read rule 3-7.4 as providing to the contrary. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
green
1 sentence1992The proposed amendments to rule 2.070 regarding court reporters were previously submitted to this court in In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, 595 So.2d 928 (Fla.1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |