5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rogers v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Rogers v. State, 957 So.2d 538, 547 (Fla.2007) (“We have consistently held that substantive claims of prosecutorial misconduct could and should be raised on direct appeal and are thus procedurally barred from consideration in a postconviction motion.”) (citations and internal quotations omitted); Lamarca v. State, 931 So.2d 838 , 851 n. 8 (Fla.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Chandler v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501, 505 (Fla.1999) (holding the law is clear that a party’s failure to object to improper prose- cutorial comments will preclude appellate review, unless the comments are so prejudicial as to constitute fundamental error); Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186, 191 (Fla.1997) (same). | 1 | 1 |
McDonald v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501, 505 (Fla.1999) (holding the law is clear that a party’s failure to object to improper prose- cutorial comments will preclude appellate review, unless the comments are so prejudicial as to constitute fundamental error); Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186, 191 (Fla.1997) (same). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lamarca v. State
green
1 sentence2012See Rogers v. State, 957 So.2d 538, 547 (Fla.2007) (“We have consistently held that substantive claims of prosecutorial misconduct could and should be raised on direct appeal and are thus procedurally barred from consideration in a postconviction motion.”) (citations and internal quotations omitted); Lamarca v. State, 931 So.2d 838 , 851 n. 8 (Fla.2006). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Hodges v. State
green
1 sentence2003Lugo primarily relies on Hodges v. State, 595 So.2d 929 (Fla.1992), vacated on other grounds, 506 U.S. 803 , 113 S.Ct. 33 , 121 L.Ed.2d 6 (1992), for his contention that the above remarks constitute fundamental error. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens
green
1 sentence2003Lugo primarily relies on Hodges v. State, 595 So.2d 929 (Fla.1992), vacated on other grounds, 506 U.S. 803 , 113 S.Ct. 33 , 121 L.Ed.2d 6 (1992), for his contention that the above remarks constitute fundamental error. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hodges v. Florida
green
1 sentence2003Lugo primarily relies on Hodges v. State, 595 So.2d 929 (Fla.1992), vacated on other grounds, 506 U.S. 803 , 113 S.Ct. 33 , 121 L.Ed.2d 6 (1992), for his contention that the above remarks constitute fundamental error. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Palmer v. State
green
1 sentence1992Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Feldman v. State
green
1 sentence1986Feldman, supra, at 49 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |