requisite standing challenge in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1967–1994 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Greenway v. Stategreen fla · 1982 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 1 sentence 1983See also Greenway v. State, 413 So.2d 23 (Fla. 1982).	1	1
Sandstrom v. Leadergreen fla · 1979 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 1 sentence 1983Although we find that appellants have the requisite standing to challenge section 768.54(3)(c), it is equally clear that they "may not challenge those portions of an enactment which do not adversely affect [their] personal or property rights." Sandstrom v. Leader, 370 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 1979).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Benitez green fla · 1981 2 sentences 1986State v. Thomas, 428 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981). 1983State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981).	2	1983–1986
Department of Educ. v. Lewis green fla · 1982 1 sentence 1994We dispense first with this issue and hold, on the authority of Brown v. Firestone, 382 So.2d 654 (Fla.1980); Arnold v. Shumpert, 217 So.2d 116 (Fla.1968) (ministerial officer challenging act providing for disbursement of public funds); Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So.2d 505 (Fla.1962) (County Commissioners had right and duty to challenge validity of section of home rule charter subjecting the county to liability in tort action); and Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455 (Fla.1982) (where operation of a statute is brought into issue in litigation brought against state officer, officer may d	1	1994–1994
Arnold v. Shumpert green fla · 1968 1 sentence 1994We dispense first with this issue and hold, on the authority of Brown v. Firestone, 382 So.2d 654 (Fla.1980); Arnold v. Shumpert, 217 So.2d 116 (Fla.1968) (ministerial officer challenging act providing for disbursement of public funds); Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So.2d 505 (Fla.1962) (County Commissioners had right and duty to challenge validity of section of home rule charter subjecting the county to liability in tort action); and Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455 (Fla.1982) (where operation of a statute is brought into issue in litigation brought against state officer, officer may d	1	1994–1994
Kaulakis v. Boyd green fla · 1962 1 sentence 1994We dispense first with this issue and hold, on the authority of Brown v. Firestone, 382 So.2d 654 (Fla.1980); Arnold v. Shumpert, 217 So.2d 116 (Fla.1968) (ministerial officer challenging act providing for disbursement of public funds); Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So.2d 505 (Fla.1962) (County Commissioners had right and duty to challenge validity of section of home rule charter subjecting the county to liability in tort action); and Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455 (Fla.1982) (where operation of a statute is brought into issue in litigation brought against state officer, officer may d	1	1994–1994
Brown v. Firestone green fla · 1980 1 sentence 1994We dispense first with this issue and hold, on the authority of Brown v. Firestone, 382 So.2d 654 (Fla.1980); Arnold v. Shumpert, 217 So.2d 116 (Fla.1968) (ministerial officer challenging act providing for disbursement of public funds); Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So.2d 505 (Fla.1962) (County Commissioners had right and duty to challenge validity of section of home rule charter subjecting the county to liability in tort action); and Department of Education v. Lewis, 416 So.2d 455 (Fla.1982) (where operation of a statute is brought into issue in litigation brought against state officer, officer may d	1	1994–1994
State v. Thomas green fladistctapp · 1983 1 sentence 1986State v. Thomas, 428 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981).	1	1986–1986
State v. Leveson green fla · 1963 1 sentence 1967The appellant argued that her cohabitation with Kish gave her "a sufficient interest" in the safe deposit box to afford her the requisite standing to challenge the search thereof and seizure of its contents, citing State v. Leveson, Fla. 1963, 151 So.2d 283 .	1	1967–1967

Where else courts name it

NY 18 (1979–2018) RI 6 (1981–2015) FL 5 (1967–1994) IL 3 (1979–1986) MO 2 (1995–2014) CT 2 (1995–2000) PA 2 (1979–1990) OH 2 (1991–2016) WA 2 (2014–2014) TX 2 (2015–2015) VA 2 (2006–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check