substantive probation violation in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (27)

Case	Followed	Cited
Lee v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2012–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	2	2
Jimmy Smith v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2014 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	2	2
Johnie Earl Larkins v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10 2018We also disapprove similar language in the following cases: Yegge , 186 So.3d at 556 ("[T]he trial court must continue a youthful offender's status after a substantive violation of probation or community control ...."); Larkins v. State , 159 So.3d 386 , 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State , 235 So.3d 1034 , 1035-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (same); Peterson v. State , 176 So.3d 1015 , 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (same); Gadson , 160 So.3d at 496 (same); St.	2	2
Flint v. Florida Commission on Offender Reviewgreen fladistctapp · 2018 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10 2018We also disapprove similar language in the following cases: Yegge , 186 So.3d at 556 ("[T]he trial court must continue a youthful offender's status after a substantive violation of probation or community control ...."); Larkins v. State , 159 So.3d 386 , 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State , 235 So.3d 1034 , 1035-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (same); Peterson v. State , 176 So.3d 1015 , 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (same); Gadson , 160 So.3d at 496 (same); St.	1	1
SOANES v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 1 sentence 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10	1	1
MacIer v. Estate of Bessie Giamportonegreen fladistctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Munnerlyn v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 1 sentence 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10	1	1
Wallace v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 ; Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 ; Gadson v. State , 160 So.3d 496 , 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Jacques v. State , 95 So.3d 419 , 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Hudson v. State , 989 So.2d 725 , 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Johnson v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Blacker v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 ; Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 ; Gadson v. State , 160 So.3d 496 , 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Jacques v. State , 95 So.3d 419 , 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Hudson v. State , 989 So.2d 725 , 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Mosley v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Gardner v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Christian v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 ; Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 ; Gadson v. State , 160 So.3d 496 , 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Jacques v. State , 95 So.3d 419 , 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Hudson v. State , 989 So.2d 725 , 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Jacques v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 ; Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 ; Gadson v. State , 160 So.3d 496 , 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Jacques v. State , 95 So.3d 419 , 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Hudson v. State , 989 So.2d 725 , 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Mistretta v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
State v. Arnettegreen fla · 1992 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018In addition, we note that the Fourth District's holding (that a trial judge must impose any associated adult minimum mandatory sentence(s) on a youthful offender when exceeding the initial six-year statutory cap for substantive probationary violations) is arguably inconsistent with dicta from State v. Arnette , 604 So.2d 482 , 484 (Fla. 1992), stating that "youthful offenders maintain youthful offender status even when they violate a condition of [probation or] community control." Florida's district courts of appeal have generally read this language from Arnette to mean that even where a trial 2018The majority acknowledges the inconsistency of its decision with our jurisprudence, stating, "we note that [this opinion] is arguably inconsistent with dicta from State v. Arnette , 604 So.2d 482 , 484 (Fla. 1992)," and the "district courts of appeal have generally read this language from Arnette to mean that even where a trial court imposes a prison sentence in excess of the six-year statutory cap after a substantive probation violation, the defendant retains his or her youthful offender 'status' *1106 along with the other attendant benefits of youthful offender sentencing." Majority op. at 1	1	1
St. Cyr v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Williams v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Stonecrest Properties Holdings, LLC v. Weissgreen fladistctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Josey v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Lewis v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Brown v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10 2018We also disapprove similar language in the following cases: Yegge , 186 So.3d at 556 ("[T]he trial court must continue a youthful offender's status after a substantive violation of probation or community control ...."); Larkins v. State , 159 So.3d 386 , 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State , 235 So.3d 1034 , 1035-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (same); Peterson v. State , 176 So.3d 1015 , 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (same); Gadson , 160 So.3d at 496 (same); St.	1	1
Peterson v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Because defendants generally must be sentenced by a court that is able to exercise its discretion and consider all of its options before imposing a sentence, see Soanes v. State, 31 So. 3d 914, 914-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Munnerlyn v. State, 795 So. 2d 171, 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), this error warrants remand and resentencing. substantive violation of probation or community control . . . .”); Larkins v. State, 159 So. 3d 386, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State, 235 So. 3d 10 2018We also disapprove similar language in the following cases: Yegge , 186 So.3d at 556 ("[T]he trial court must continue a youthful offender's status after a substantive violation of probation or community control ...."); Larkins v. State , 159 So.3d 386 , 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State , 235 So.3d 1034 , 1035-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (same); Peterson v. State , 176 So.3d 1015 , 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (same); Gadson , 160 So.3d at 496 (same); St.	1	1
Goldwire v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018In so holding, the district court relied on the Second District’s decision in Yegge v. State, 186 So. 3d 553, 556-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (upholding application of minimum mandatory sentence enhancements to a youthful offender’s sentence following a substantive probation violation), as well as its own decision in Goldwire v. State, 73 So. 3d 844, 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that it is within the court’s discretion to revoke youthful offender status and apply minimum mandatory sentence enhancements). 2018In so holding, the district court relied on the Second District's decision in Yegge v. State , 186 So.3d 553 , 556-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (upholding application of minimum mandatory sentence enhancements to a youthful offender's sentence following a substantive probation violation), as well as its own decision in Goldwire v. State , 73 So.3d 844 , 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that it is within the court's discretion to revoke youthful offender status and apply minimum mandatory sentence enhancements).	1	1
Tidwell v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Cyr v. State, 106 So. 3d 487, 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State, 128 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880, 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State, 99 So. 3d 561, 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian, 84 So. 3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State, 74 So. 3d 503, 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker, 49 So. 3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State, 41 So. 3d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson, 989 So. 2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State, 972 So. 2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. State, 1 2018Cyr v. State , 106 So.3d 487 , 488-89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Josey v. State , 128 So.3d 247 , 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (same); Lachenauer v. State , 117 So.3d 880 , 880-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (same); Mistretta v. State , 99 So.3d 561 , 561-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (same); Christian , 84 So.3d at 442 (same); Tidwell v. State , 74 So.3d 503 , 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); Blacker , 49 So.3d at 788 (same); Johnson v. State , 41 So.3d 1115 , 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same); Hudson , 989 So.2d at 726 (same); Rogers v. State , 972 So.2d 1017 , 1019-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. S	1	1
Yegge v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018In so holding, the district court relied on the Second District's decision in Yegge v. State , 186 So.3d 553 , 556-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (upholding application of minimum mandatory sentence enhancements to a youthful offender's sentence following a substantive probation violation), as well as its own decision in Goldwire v. State , 73 So.3d 844 , 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that it is within the court's discretion to revoke youthful offender status and apply minimum mandatory sentence enhancements). 2018We also disapprove similar language in the following cases: Yegge , 186 So.3d at 556 ("[T]he trial court must continue a youthful offender's status after a substantive violation of probation or community control ...."); Larkins v. State , 159 So.3d 386 , 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation); Cooper v. State , 235 So.3d 1034 , 1035-37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (same); Peterson v. State , 176 So.3d 1015 , 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (same); Gadson , 160 So.3d at 496 (same); St.	1	1
Swilley v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007State v. Jenkins, 762 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Swilley v. State, 781 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)(absent evidence of a substantive probation violation, summary denial of rule 3.800 petition reversed for attachment of record to establish that defendant committed a substantive violation).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Jenkins green fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2007State v. Jenkins, 762 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Swilley v. State, 781 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)(absent evidence of a substantive probation violation, summary denial of rule 3.800 petition reversed for attachment of record to establish that defendant committed a substantive violation).	1	2007–2007
Reeves v. State green fladistctapp · 1992 1 sentence 1998See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1990); Reeves v. State, 605 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).	1	1998–1998

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 958.14 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check