5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Sugarmangreen1 sentence2019Vision sought certification under rule 1.220(b)(3), requiring Vision to show that “common questions of law or fact predominate over the individual questions of the separate members and that the class action be manageable and superior to other available methods of fairly adjudicating the controversy.” Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Sugarman, 909 So.2d 923, 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). “[A] class representative establishes predominance if he or she demonstrates a reasonable methodology for generalized proof of class-wide impact.” Sosa, 73 So. 2d at 111. | 1 | 1 |
Earnest v. Amoco Oil Co.green1 sentence2011See Earnest v. Amoco Oil Co., 859 So.2d 1255, 1257-58 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). | 1 | 1 |
City of Tampa v. Addisongreen1 sentence2010See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rollins, Inc. v. Butland
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 868 . 2007If the requirements of subsection (a) are met, “a plaintiff must also satisfy one of the three subdivisions of rule 1.220(b).” Rollins, 951 So.2d at 868 . | 2 | 2007–2009 |
Sosa v. SAFEWAY PREMIUM FINANCE CO.
green
1 sentence2019“In addition, the proponent of class certification must satisfy one of the three subdivisions of rule 1.220(b).” Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |