brief of plaintiff error in Georgia

5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1908–1930 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Southern Railway Co. v. Sewellgreen gactapp · 1916 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1930–1930 1 sentence 1930Co. v. Sewell, 18 Ga. App. 544, 552 ( 90 S. E. 94 ), is a complete answer to this; especially as it is there held that “Where an agent fails to use reasonable care or diligence in the performance of his duty, he will be personalty responsible to a third person who is injured by such misfeasance.	1	1
City of Atlanta v. Jacobsgreen ga · 1906 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1927–1927 2 sentences 1927In a similar case it was ruled: “If this relief can be afforded through legal remedies, equity will not interfere by injunction.” City of Atlanta v. Jacobs, 125 Ga. 523, 528 ( 54 S. E. 534 ). 1927In a similar case it was ruled: “If this relief can be afforded through legal remedies, equity will not interfere by injunction.” City of Atlanta v. Jacobs, 125 Ga. 523, 528 ( 54 S. E. 534 ).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

Case	Cited	Years
Robinson v. St. Louis Coffin Co. neutral gactapp · 1916 1 sentence 1930Co. v. Sewell, 18 Ga. App. 544, 552 ( 90 S. E. 94 ), is a complete answer to this; especially as it is there held that “Where an agent fails to use reasonable care or diligence in the performance of his duty, he will be personalty responsible to a third person who is injured by such misfeasance.	1	1930–1930
Henry v. Georgia & Florida Railway neutral gactapp · 1915 1 sentence 1923In Cason v. State, 16 Ga. App. 828 ( 86 S. E. 649 ), this court said: “A corporation de facto is one exercising corporate powers under color of a more or less legal organization.” In McRee v. Quitman Oil Co., 16 Ga. App. 12 (3) ( 84 S. E. 487 ), it was said: “A 'corporation is a de facto corporation where there is a law authorizing such a corporation and where the company has made an effort to organize under the law and is transacting business in a corporate name. . .	1	1923–1923
McRee v. Quitman Oil Co. neutral gactapp · 1915 1 sentence 1923In Cason v. State, 16 Ga. App. 828 ( 86 S. E. 649 ), this court said: “A corporation de facto is one exercising corporate powers under color of a more or less legal organization.” In McRee v. Quitman Oil Co., 16 Ga. App. 12 (3) ( 84 S. E. 487 ), it was said: “A 'corporation is a de facto corporation where there is a law authorizing such a corporation and where the company has made an effort to organize under the law and is transacting business in a corporate name. . .	1	1923–1923
Crawford v. State green ga · 1919 1 sentence 1921Crawford v. State, 149 Ga. 485 (4) ( 100 S. E. 633 ) ; Starling v. State, 24 Ga. App. 422 (3) ( 100 S. E. 771 ).	1	1921–1921
Barksdale v. State neutral gactapp · 1919 1 sentence 1921Crawford v. State, 149 Ga. 485 (4) ( 100 S. E. 633 ) ; Starling v. State, 24 Ga. App. 422 (3) ( 100 S. E. 771 ).	1	1921–1921
Starling v. State neutral gactapp · 1919 1 sentence 1921Crawford v. State, 149 Ga. 485 (4) ( 100 S. E. 633 ) ; Starling v. State, 24 Ga. App. 422 (3) ( 100 S. E. 771 ).	1	1921–1921
Bailey v. State neutral gactapp · 1919 1 sentence 1921Crawford v. State, 149 Ga. 485 (4) ( 100 S. E. 633 ) ; Starling v. State, 24 Ga. App. 422 (3) ( 100 S. E. 771 ).	1	1921–1921
Carruth v. Wagener green ga · 1902 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Hollis v. Lamb green ga · 1902 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Moon v. State green ga · 1902 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Easterlin v. New Home Sewing Machine Co. neutral ga · 1902 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Nowell v. Haire neutral ga · 1902 2 sentences 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ). 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks green ga · 1904 2 sentences 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ). 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Rountree v. Jones neutral ga · 1905 2 sentences 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ). 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Hughes v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. neutral ga · 1906 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908
Palmer v. Inman neutral · 1906 1 sentence 1908These decisions cited on the brief of plaintiff in error, especially, asked to be reviewed and reversed, are the following: Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 ( 40 S. E. 751 ); Easterlin v. Sewing Machine Co., 115 Ga. 305 ( 41 S. E. 595 ); Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386 ( 42 S. E. 719 ); Columbus Fertilizer Co. v. Hanks, 119 Ga. 950 ( 47 S. E. 222 ); Rountree v. Wilson, 124 Ga. 395 ( 52 S. E. 325 ); Palmer v. Inman, 126 Ga. 519 ( 55 S. E. 229 ).	1	1908–1908

Where else courts name it

OK 55 (1899–1961) NE 12 (1886–1911) OH 8 (1905–1936) IL 8 (1896–1944) FL 5 (1903–1937) GA 5 (1908–1930) KS 4 (1879–1909) CO 2 (1912–1924) MO 2 (1884–1913)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check