accurate analysis (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

accurate analysis in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1945–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Band v. Reinkegreen
iowa · 1941 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1945–1965
2 sentences

1965It has been said that this method is the best and most accurate test as to whether a former judgment is¡ a bar in subsequent proceedings between the two parties, and it has even been designated as infallible.” See Band v. Reinke, 230 Iowa 515, 519 , 298 N.W. 865 , 868.

1945It has been said that this method is the best and most accurate test as to whether a former judginent is a bar in subsequent proceedings between the same parties, and it has even been designated as infallible.” See, also, Band v. Reinke, 230 Iowa 515, 519, 520 , 298 N. W. 865 .

12
Mercy Hospital v. Hansen, Lind & Meyer, P.C.green
iowa · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Wilson also focuses on the purpose underlying section 535.3, which is to discourage “persons obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.” Baculis, 430 N.W.2d at 401 (citing Dillon v. City of Davenport, 366 N.W.2d 918, 926 (Iowa 1985)); see also Mercy Hosp. v. Hansen, Lind & Meyer, P.C., 456 N.W.2d 666, 674 (Iowa 1990) (“[Application of the statute’s plain language will nevertheless further its goal of preventing persons rightfully obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.”); Janda v. Iowa Indus.

11
Dillon v. City of Davenportgreen
iowa · 1985 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Wilson also focuses on the purpose underlying section 535.3, which is to discourage “persons obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.” Baculis, 430 N.W.2d at 401 (citing Dillon v. City of Davenport, 366 N.W.2d 918, 926 (Iowa 1985)); see also Mercy Hosp. v. Hansen, Lind & Meyer, P.C., 456 N.W.2d 666, 674 (Iowa 1990) (“[Application of the statute’s plain language will nevertheless further its goal of preventing persons rightfully obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.”); Janda v. Iowa Indus.

11
Moreno v. Vietorgreen
iowa · 1968 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999He relies on the definition of judgment provided in Moreno v. Vietor: Although some of our cases say there is no judgment until it has been entered of record, we believe the more accurate analysis of the cases is that a judgment is rendered when it is announced, or when the judge writes in his calendar a statement of his decision or a jury returns a verdict but that there is no competent evidence of such rendition until the entry is made on the court record. 261 Iowa 806, 810 , 156 N.W.2d 305, 307 (1968) (emphasis added).

1999He relies on the definition of judgment provided in Moreno v. Vietor: Although some of our cases say there is no judgment until it has been entered of record, we believe the more accurate analysis of the cases is that a judgment is rendered when it is announced, or when the judge writes in his calendar a statement of his decision or a jury returns a verdict but that there is no competent evidence of such rendition until the entry is made on the court record. 261 Iowa 806, 810 , 156 N.W.2d 305, 307 (1968) (emphasis added).

11
Lenning v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Divisiongreen
iowa · 1985 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985Accurate test results, if positive, provide valuable evidence for use in criminal prosecution, and the legislature has given high priority to “the enforcement of laws prohibiting operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence ... or while having a certain amount of alcohol in the blood.” Iowa Code § 321B.1 (1983) (declaration of policy); see Lenning v. Iowa Department of Transportation, 368 N.W.2d 98, 101 (Iowa 1985) (upholding DOT rules denying issuance of work permits to persons with prior license revocations).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
In Re the Marriage of Baculis green
iowa · 1988
1 sentence

1999Wilson also focuses on the purpose underlying section 535.3, which is to discourage “persons obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.” Baculis, 430 N.W.2d at 401 (citing Dillon v. City of Davenport, 366 N.W.2d 918, 926 (Iowa 1985)); see also Mercy Hosp. v. Hansen, Lind & Meyer, P.C., 456 N.W.2d 666, 674 (Iowa 1990) (“[Application of the statute’s plain language will nevertheless further its goal of preventing persons rightfully obligated to pay money to another from profiting through delays in litigation.”); Janda v. Iowa Indus.

11999–1999
Street v. Stewart green
iowa · 1939
2 sentences

1968Street v. Stewart, 226 Iowa 960, 963 , 285 N.W. 204, 205 ; 13 I.L.R. 242-243.

1968Street v. Stewart, 226 Iowa 960, 963 , 285 N.W. 204, 205 ; 13 I.L.R. 242-243.

11968–1968

Where else courts name it

IL 51 (1875–2025) FL 45 (1981–2020) UT 24 (1969–2024) MN 19 (1900–2024) NY 15 (1914–2014) MI 14 (1976–2024) CA 11 (1969–2026) WA 11 (1926–2021) PA 11 (1955–2020) CO 9 (1929–2001) OH 8 (1934–2021) NV 8 (1970–2019) TX 7 (1937–2015) CT 6 (1935–2023) TN 6 (2000–2025) KS 6 (1920–1991) KY 5 (1928–2020) IA 5 (1945–1999) AL 5 (1884–2001) MS 5 (1986–2003) WI 5 (1887–2007) GA 4 (1946–1980) MA 4 (1979–2018) WV 4 (1996–2020) NJ 4 (2011–2024) HI 3 (1999–2002) IN 3 (1987–2025) MO 3 (1956–2018) VT 3 (2010–2013) MD 3 (1981–1997) VA 2 (1985–2013) OR 2 (1917–1998) RI 2 (2001–2021) NM 2 (1998–2012) WY 2 (1978–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check