5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gurseygreen2 sentences2016People v. Gursey, 239 N.E.2d 351, 352 (N.Y. 1968). 2016People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 , 239 N.E.2d 351, 352 (1968). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Charlsongreen1 sentence2017See id. at 61 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rainsgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Rains , 574 N.W.2d 904 , 913-14 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Williams , 895 N.W.2d 856 (Iowa 2017). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Deantay Darelle Williamsgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Rains , 574 N.W.2d 904 , 913-14 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Williams , 895 N.W.2d 856 (Iowa 2017). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jensengreen1 sentence1985Compare State v. Jensen, 216 N.W.2d 369, 372 (Iowa 1974) (not listing any time requirement in an itemization of “standards for the [Iowa Code chapter 321B] procedure”) with State v. Schlemme, 301 N.W.2d at 723 (Itemizing, as one of the “specific procedural requirements,” “that the test be provided within two hours after the arrest.”). 3 It is sufficient for the disposition of this case that the test was made available to defendant within the two-hour period, whether or not that period is a foundational requirement for the introduction of the test results in a criminal trial. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Schlemmegreen1 sentence1985Compare State v. Jensen, 216 N.W.2d 369, 372 (Iowa 1974) (not listing any time requirement in an itemization of “standards for the [Iowa Code chapter 321B] procedure”) with State v. Schlemme, 301 N.W.2d at 723 (Itemizing, as one of the “specific procedural requirements,” “that the test be provided within two hours after the arrest.”). 3 It is sufficient for the disposition of this case that the test was made available to defendant within the two-hour period, whether or not that period is a foundational requirement for the introduction of the test results in a criminal trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.