5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Draytongreen2 sentences2022Bohns, The Voluntariness of Voluntary Consent: Consent Searches and the Psychology of Compliance, 128 Yale L.J. 1962 , 1969 (2019) [hereinafter Sommers & Bohns]. 170United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 212 (2002) (Souter, J., dissenting). 2022Bohns, The Voluntariness of Voluntary Consent: Consent Searches and the Psychology of Compliance, 128 Yale L.J. 1962 , 1969 (2019) [hereinafter Sommers & Bohns]. 170United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 212 (2002) (Souter, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
Estate of David Paul McFarlin by Its Personal Representative, Jamie Laass Jamie Laass, Individually And Jamie Laass, as Parent and Next Friend of S.L. v. State of Iowagreen2 sentences2022See Est. of McFarlin v. State, 881 N.W.2d 51, 59 (Iowa 2016) (“We do not ordinarily overrule our precedent sua sponte.”). 2022See Est. of McFarlin v. State, 881 N.W.2d 51, 59 (Iowa 2016) (“We do not ordinarily overrule our precedent sua sponte.”). | 1 | 1 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen1 sentence2018See 412 U.S. at 227 , 93 S.Ct. at 2047-48. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Robinettegreen2 sentences2011See Robinette III, 685 N.E.2d at 771-72 . 2011See Robinette III, 685 N.E.2d at 771-72 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Randall Lee Pals
green
2 sentences2022Critics of Schneckloth focus primarily on the lack of clarity and predictability in the Schneckloth test and question whether a per se requirement that officers must warn individuals of their right to refuse would actually “be an unreasonable burden on law enforcement.” Id. at 781–82 (majority opinion). 2022Critics of Schneckloth focus primarily on the lack of clarity and predictability in the Schneckloth test and question whether a per se requirement that officers must warn individuals of their right to refuse would actually “be an unreasonable burden on law enforcement.” Id. at 781–82 (majority opinion). | 4 | 2018–2022 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.