5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Jimmie T. Duvall and Alfred Grant Revettegreen2 sentences2019As noted in United States v. Duvall, the shocks-the-conscience test is reserved for “the rarest and most outrageous circumstances.” 846 F.2d 966, 973 (5th Cir. 1988) (quoting United States v. Arteaga, 807 F.2d 424, 426 (5th Cir. 1986)). 2019As noted in United States v. Duvall , the shocks-the-conscience test is reserved for "the rarest and most outrageous circumstances." 846 F.2d 966 , 973 (5th Cir. 1988) *554 (quoting United States v. Arteaga , 807 F.2d 424 , 426 (5th Cir. 1986) ). | 3 | 3 |
United States v. Dario Arteagagreen2 sentences2019As noted in United States v. Duvall, the shocks-the-conscience test is reserved for “the rarest and most outrageous circumstances.” 846 F.2d 966, 973 (5th Cir. 1988) (quoting United States v. Arteaga, 807 F.2d 424, 426 (5th Cir. 1986)). 2019As noted in United States v. Duvall , the shocks-the-conscience test is reserved for "the rarest and most outrageous circumstances." 846 F.2d 966 , 973 (5th Cir. 1988) *554 (quoting United States v. Arteaga , 807 F.2d 424 , 426 (5th Cir. 1986) ). | 3 | 3 |
Randy Mulholland v. Government County of Berksgreen1 sentence2022See 12 F.4th at 844 . 28 Government County of Berks, 706 F.3d 227, 241 (3d Cir. 2013))); Mitchell v. Dakota Cnty. | 1 | 1 |
Hal Stanley v. Asa Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2022See 12 F.4th at 844 . 28 Government County of Berks, 706 F.3d 227, 241 (3d Cir. 2013))); Mitchell v. Dakota Cnty. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rochin v. California
green
2 sentences2019Under federal precedent following Rochin , 342 U.S. 165 , 72 S.Ct. 205 , 96 L.Ed. 183 , the shocks-the-conscience test has become extremely difficult to meet. 2019Under federal precedent following Rochin , 342 U.S. 165 , 72 S.Ct. 205 , 96 L.Ed. 183 , the shocks-the-conscience test has become extremely difficult to meet. | 3 | 2018–2019 |
Nicole Maddox v. Babette Stephens
green
1 sentence2022Similarly, in Maddox v. Stephens, the Eleventh Circuit applied the conscience-shocking standard in rejecting the substantive due process claim of a mother against a county social worker who had prepared a safety plan that separated the mother from her child. 727 F.3d 1109 , 1113–17, 1126 (11th Cir. 2013); see also A.J. v. Lancaster County, 826 F. App’x 248 , 250 (3d Cir. 2020) (explaining that the shocks-the-conscience standard is met only if the child welfare agency lacked “reasonable and articulable evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that [[the child] had] been abused or [was] in | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Blumenthal Investment Trusts v. City of West Des Moines
green
2 sentences2019Situations that meet the shocks-the- conscience test include “outrageous utilization of physical force; state-sponsored imposition of uncalled-for embarrassment or ridicule; or intolerable, disreputable, and underhanded tactics that may arise from government action deliberately designed to penetrate the attorney-client privilege.” Id. 2019Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, we conclude the district properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on claims IV and VI to the extent those claims allege the defendants deprived the Blazek family of their substantive due process rights under article I, section 9 of the Iowa Constitution. “[U]nder substantive due process analysis, the state is 13 given great leeway in achieving its legitimate goals, particularly related to public safety.” Id. (citing Mackey v. Montrym, 443 U.S. 1 , 17–19 (1979)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
MacKey v. Montrym
green
1 sentence2019Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, we conclude the district properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on claims IV and VI to the extent those claims allege the defendants deprived the Blazek family of their substantive due process rights under article I, section 9 of the Iowa Constitution. “[U]nder substantive due process analysis, the state is 13 given great leeway in achieving its legitimate goals, particularly related to public safety.” Id. (citing Mackey v. Montrym, 443 U.S. 1 , 17–19 (1979)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.