benchmark for judging claim in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Strickland v. Washingtongreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 5 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1999–2012 2 sentences 2012The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffectiveness is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied upon as having produced a just result.” Id. at 686 . 2006The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffectiveness is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied upon as having produced a just result.” Id. at 686 , 104 S.Ct. at 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 692 .	3	5
State v. Mathewsgreen idaho · 1999 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2000–2003 2 sentences 2003The relevant rules are laid out in State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300 , 986 P.2d 323 (1999): The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-93 (1984). 2003The relevant rules are laid out in State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300 , 986 P.2d 323 (1999): The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-93 (1984).	1	2
Ray v. Stategreen idaho · 1999 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000The test for evaluating whether a criminal defendant has received the effective assistance of counsel is two-pronged and requires the petitioner to establish: (1) counsel’s conduct was deficient because it fell outside the wide range of professional norms; and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced as a result of that deficient conduct. 1 Ray v. State, 133 Idaho 96, 101 , 982 P.2d 931, 936 (1999) (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. at 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 693 ). 2000The test for evaluating whether a criminal defendant has received the effective assistance of counsel is two-pronged and requires the petitioner to establish: (1) counsel’s conduct was deficient because it fell outside the wide range of professional norms; and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced as a result of that deficient conduct. 1 Ray v. State, 133 Idaho 96, 101 , 982 P.2d 931, 936 (1999) (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. at 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 693 ).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Singleton v. Hargett green scotus · 2000 1 sentence 2000The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300, 306 , 986 P.2d 323, 329 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1168 , 120 S.Ct. 1190 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1095 (2000) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-93 (1984)).	1	2000–2000
Kruelski v. Connecticut green scotus · 2000 1 sentence 2000The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300, 306 , 986 P.2d 323, 329 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1168 , 120 S.Ct. 1190 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1095 (2000) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-93 (1984)).	1	2000–2000
Tearfie v. Whittlesea Blue Cab Co. green scotus · 2000 1 sentence 2000The benchmark for judging a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is “whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300, 306 , 986 P.2d 323, 329 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1168 , 120 S.Ct. 1190 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1095 (2000) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-93 (1984)).	1	2000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 19-4906 (3) ID § Idaho Code § 19-4907 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AR 106 (2009–2026) OH 6 (1995–1999) ID 5 (1999–2012) IL 2 (1992–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check