5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Miller
green
2 sentences2018The Court explained that the object of this consideration is to "encourage and foster the rehabilitation of one who has for the first time fallen into error, and whose character for crime has not become fixed." Id. 2018The Court explained that the object of this consideration is to “encourage and foster the rehabilitation of one who has for the first time fallen into error, and whose character for crime has not become fixed.” Id. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. O'DELL
green
2 sentences1983State v. O'Dell, 71 Idaho 64 , 225 P.2d 1020 . 1983State v. O'Dell, 71 Idaho 64 , 225 P.2d 1020 . | 2 | 1953–1983 |
State v. Owen
green
2 sentences1978Id. at 402 , 253 P.2d at 207 . 1978Id. at 402 , 253 P.2d at 207 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |