5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strino v. Premier Healthcare Associatesgreen2 sentences2010Strino, 365 Ill.App.3d at 904-05 , 302 Ill.Dec. 784 , 850 N.E.2d 221 (in the absence of a special interrogatory, a court of review cannot "determine whether the jury found in the defendant's favor on the negligence issue[, rather than on contributory negligence]"). 2010Strino, 365 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Patrickgreen1 sentence2021See id. ¶¶ 49-51 (citing People v. Patrick, 233 Ill. 2d 62, 76-77 (2009) (the defendant waived any objection to the jury instruction by proffering the allegedly erroneous instruction) and People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003) (“the doctrine of ‘invited error’ precluded the defendant from challenging an action of the trial court that the defendant, himself, requested”); see also People v. Parker, 223 Ill. 2d 494, 508 (2006) (the defendant cannot directly attack a jury instruction tendered by the defense; the defendant invited any error by doing so). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Parkergreen1 sentence2021See id. ¶¶ 49-51 (citing People v. Patrick, 233 Ill. 2d 62, 76-77 (2009) (the defendant waived any objection to the jury instruction by proffering the allegedly erroneous instruction) and People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003) (“the doctrine of ‘invited error’ precluded the defendant from challenging an action of the trial court that the defendant, himself, requested”); see also People v. Parker, 223 Ill. 2d 494, 508 (2006) (the defendant cannot directly attack a jury instruction tendered by the defense; the defendant invited any error by doing so). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bostongreen1 sentence2021See id. ¶¶ 49-51 (citing People v. Patrick, 233 Ill. 2d 62, 76-77 (2009) (the defendant waived any objection to the jury instruction by proffering the allegedly erroneous instruction) and People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003) (“the doctrine of ‘invited error’ precluded the defendant from challenging an action of the trial court that the defendant, himself, requested”); see also People v. Parker, 223 Ill. 2d 494, 508 (2006) (the defendant cannot directly attack a jury instruction tendered by the defense; the defendant invited any error by doing so). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cartergreen1 sentence2021See id. ¶¶ 49-51 (citing People v. Patrick, 233 Ill. 2d 62, 76-77 (2009) (the defendant waived any objection to the jury instruction by proffering the allegedly erroneous instruction) and People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003) (“the doctrine of ‘invited error’ precluded the defendant from challenging an action of the trial court that the defendant, himself, requested”); see also People v. Parker, 223 Ill. 2d 494, 508 (2006) (the defendant cannot directly attack a jury instruction tendered by the defense; the defendant invited any error by doing so). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Summers
green
1 sentence1994Also, as in both cases, here there is "no indication that the jury in fact ever found that the State had proved defendant guilty of both first degree murder and involuntary manslaughter, thereby causing the erroneous portion of IPI Criminal 2d No. 26.01Q (Supp. 1989) to be activated.” (Emphasis in original.) Summers, 202 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
People v. Jenkins
green
2 sentences1979Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 451(c); People v. Jenkins (1977), 69 Ill. 2d 61 , 370 N.E.2d 532 .) We note that the defense did not raise the allegedly erroneous instruction as a point of error in its post-trial motion. 2 The State contraposits waiver and harmless error to defendant’s theory. 1979Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 451(c); People v. Jenkins (1977), 69 Ill. 2d 61 , 370 N.E.2d 532 .) We note that the defense did not raise the allegedly erroneous instruction as a point of error in its post-trial motion. 2 The State contraposits waiver and harmless error to defendant’s theory. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.