5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Pearsongreen2 sentences2010People v. Pearson, 331 Ill. 2010People v. Pearson, 331 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Dinelligreen2 sentences2008In People v. Dinelli, 217 Ill. 2d 387, 404 (2005), the supreme court again adopted the Baity test to analyze whether the two crimes at issue there were predicated on one or more acts. 2008In People v. Dinelli, 217 Ill. 2d 387, 404 (2005), the supreme court again adopted the Baity test to analyze whether the two crimes at issue there were predicated on one or more acts. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2023Otherwise, he would have deleted, or attempted to delete, the videos before being confronted by Ericka, not after being confronted. ¶ 28 While many of the Baity factors favor the finding of a single act, and the factors are undoubtedly helpful, our supreme court has “caution[ed] that a court must not lose sight of the forest for the trees” as “[t]he definition of an ‘act’ under the King doctrine remains simply what this court stated in King: ‘any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different offense.’ ” People v. Rodriguez, 169 Ill. 2d 183, 188 (1996) (quoting King, 66 Ill. 2d 2023Otherwise, he would have deleted, or attempted to delete, the videos before being confronted by Ericka, not after being confronted. ¶ 28 While many of the Baity factors favor the finding of a single act, and the factors are undoubtedly helpful, our supreme court has “caution[ed] that a court must not lose sight of the forest for the trees” as “[t]he definition of an ‘act’ under the King doctrine remains simply what this court stated in King: ‘any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different offense.’ ” People v. Rodriguez, 169 Ill. 2d 183, 188 (1996) (quoting King, 66 Ill. 2d | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Keefer
green
2 sentences2010Keefer, 229 Ill. 2010Keefer, 229 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Porter
green
2 sentences2008Based on Sienkiewicz and Dinelli, then, we will employ the Baity test to determine whether the Illinois prosecution is “for the same conduct” (Porter, 156 Ill. 2d at 222 ), i.e., predicated on the same act, as the New Mexico conviction. 2008Based on Sienkiewicz and Dinelli, then, we will employ the Baity test to determine whether the Illinois prosecution is “for the same conduct” (Porter, 156 Ill. 2d at 222 ), i.e., predicated on the same act, as the New Mexico conviction. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Sienkiewicz
green
2 sentences2008Sienkiewicz, 208 Ill. 2d at 7-8 . 2008Sienkiewicz, 208 Ill. 2d at 7-8 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Flaar
green
2 sentences2023Id. ¶ 25 Applying the Baity factors to the instant case, many of them indisputably favor the finding of a single act. 2023Id. ¶ 25 Applying the Baity factors to the instant case, many of them indisputably favor the finding of a single act. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Dunnavan
green
2 sentences2023Id. at 519 . 2023Id. at 520 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. King
green
2 sentences2023Otherwise, he would have deleted, or attempted to delete, the videos before being confronted by Ericka, not after being confronted. ¶ 28 While many of the Baity factors favor the finding of a single act, and the factors are undoubtedly helpful, our supreme court has “caution[ed] that a court must not lose sight of the forest for the trees” as “[t]he definition of an ‘act’ under the King doctrine remains simply what this court stated in King: ‘any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different offense.’ ” People v. Rodriguez, 169 Ill. 2d 183, 188 (1996) (quoting King, 66 Ill. 2d 2023Otherwise, he would have deleted, or attempted to delete, the videos before being confronted by Ericka, not after being confronted. ¶ 28 While many of the Baity factors favor the finding of a single act, and the factors are undoubtedly helpful, our supreme court has “caution[ed] that a court must not lose sight of the forest for the trees” as “[t]he definition of an ‘act’ under the King doctrine remains simply what this court stated in King: ‘any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different offense.’ ” People v. Rodriguez, 169 Ill. 2d 183, 188 (1996) (quoting King, 66 Ill. 2d | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Baity
green
2 sentences2008Sienkiewicz noted that, in People v. Baity, 125 Ill.App.3d 50 , 80 Ill.Dec. 510 , 465 N.E.2d 622 (1984), the appellate court had adopted a six-factor test designed to analyze whether there were one or more acts underlying the charges, and it noted further that the supreme court had never positively endorsed the Baity analysis. 2008Sienkiewicz noted that, in People v. Baity, 125 Ill.App.3d 50 , 80 Ill.Dec. 510 , 465 N.E.2d 622 (1984), the appellate court had adopted a six-factor test designed to analyze whether there were one or more acts underlying the charges, and it noted further that the supreme court had never positively endorsed the Baity analysis. | 1 | 2008–2008 |