5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rolandis G.green2 sentences2024When considering whether an error was harmless, this court “may (1) focus on the error to determine whether it might have contributed to the conviction; (2) examine the other properly admitted evidence to determine whether it overwhelmingly supports the conviction; or (3) determine whether the improperly admitted evidence is merely cumulative or duplicates properly admitted evidence.” In re Rolandis G., 232 Ill. 2d 13, 43 , 902 N.E.2d 600, 617 (2008). ¶ 76 In Stowe, the appellate court found the error was not harmless. 2024When considering whether an error was harmless, this court “may (1) focus on the error to determine whether it might have contributed to the conviction; (2) examine the other properly admitted evidence to determine whether it overwhelmingly supports the conviction; or (3) determine whether the improperly admitted evidence is merely cumulative or duplicates properly admitted evidence.” In re Rolandis G., 232 Ill. 2d 13, 43 , 902 N.E.2d 600, 617 (2008). ¶ 76 In Stowe, the appellate court found the error was not harmless. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cortesgreen1 sentence2022People v. Shaw, 2016 IL App (4th) 150444, ¶ 66 (citing In re E.H., 224 Ill. 2d 172, 180 (2006)); see also People v. Cortes, 181 Ill. 2d 249, 285 (1998) (“While the erroneous admission of other-crimes evidence carries a high risk of prejudice and ordinarily calls for reversal [citation], the evidence must be so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial ***.”). | 1 | 1 |
In Re EHgreen1 sentence2022People v. Shaw, 2016 IL App (4th) 150444, ¶ 66 (citing In re E.H., 224 Ill. 2d 172, 180 (2006)); see also People v. Cortes, 181 Ill. 2d 249, 285 (1998) (“While the erroneous admission of other-crimes evidence carries a high risk of prejudice and ordinarily calls for reversal [citation], the evidence must be so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial ***.”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Shawgreen1 sentence2022People v. Shaw, 2016 IL App (4th) 150444, ¶ 66 (citing In re E.H., 224 Ill. 2d 172, 180 (2006)); see also People v. Cortes, 181 Ill. 2d 249, 285 (1998) (“While the erroneous admission of other-crimes evidence carries a high risk of prejudice and ordinarily calls for reversal [citation], the evidence must be so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial ***.”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Collinsgreen1 sentence2020People v. Drake, 2019 IL 123734, ¶ 29 ; People v. Collins, 106 Ill. 2d 237, 261 (1985). ¶ 34 Our review of the record reveals that the evidence is such that a reasonable finder of fact could find Gold-Smith guilty of solicitation of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Stowe
green
1 sentence2024“An evidentiary error is harmless if there is no reasonable probability the jury would have acquitted the defendant without the error.” Stowe, 2022 IL App (2d) 210296, ¶ 68 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Drake
green
1 sentence2020People v. Drake, 2019 IL 123734, ¶ 29 ; People v. Collins, 106 Ill. 2d 237, 261 (1985). ¶ 34 Our review of the record reveals that the evidence is such that a reasonable finder of fact could find Gold-Smith guilty of solicitation of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Pate v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1982Because the trial of the defendant without a hearing on the issue of his fitness to stand trial resulted in the denial of a fair trial (Pate v. Robinson (1966), 383 U.S. 375 , 15 L. 1982Because the trial of the defendant without a hearing on the issue of his fitness to stand trial resulted in the denial of a fair trial (Pate v. Robinson (1966), 383 U.S. 375 , 15 L. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Kallem
neutral
1 sentence1982A finding in favor of a defendant in an implied consent hearing is final and appealable (People v. Kallem (1979), 69 Ill. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.