emerging adult claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

emerging adult claim in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2022–2026 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Miller v. Alabamagreen
scotus · 2012 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022Defendant argues the petition in this case “strongly suggests that his mandatory de facto life sentence was unconstitutional” under the proportionate penalties clause of the Illinois constitution in the light of Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) and People v. House, 2015 IL App (1st) 110580 .

2022In Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 489 (2012), the United States Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to impose upon a juvenile offender a sentence of life without the possibility of parole without considering the juvenile’s youth.

12
People v. Griffingreen
illappct · 2006 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See, e.g., People v. Griffin, 368 Ill.

11
People v. Greengreen
illappct · 2022 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See People v. Green, 2022 IL App (1st) 200749, ¶ 42 (collecting cases and concluding “the line of adulthood has been drawn at age 21.”) The defendant, however, relies on what may be the only case allowing an emerging adult claim to proceed for a defendant over the age of 21, People v. Savage, 2020 IL App (1st) 173135 .

11
People v. Savagegreen
illappct · 2020 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See People v. Green, 2022 IL App (1st) 200749, ¶ 42 (collecting cases and concluding “the line of adulthood has been drawn at age 21.”) The defendant, however, relies on what may be the only case allowing an emerging adult claim to proceed for a defendant over the age of 21, People v. Savage, 2020 IL App (1st) 173135 .

11
People v. Turnergreen
ill · 1999 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Specifically, petitioner alleges postconviction counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to properly raise a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress petitioner’s statement to the police, (2) raising a claim that was barred by res judicata, (3) failing to raise an emerging-adult claim, and (4) failing to raise a meritorious speedy-trial and compulsory-joinder claim. ¶ 23 During postconviction proceedings, a petitioner is entitled to a “reasonable level of assistance.” People v. Turner, 187 Ill. 2d 406, 410 (1999).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. House green
ill · 2021
2 sentences

2024The Addison majority further held that “the appellate court correctly remanded the cause for compliance with Rule 651(c) without considering whether the claims in the petition were meritorious.” Id. ¶ 22 In the present case, appointed counsel violated Rule 651(c) by failing to shape the claim into proper form, because, inter alia, counsel failed to allege specific facts in support of the emerging adult claim as required by the Illinois Supreme Court case of People v. House, 2021 IL 125124 , and advanced arguments on an eighth amendment claim that had previously been abandoned following the Ill

2022Defendant cites People v. House, 2021 IL 125124 for the proposition that even a “bare-boned” pro se post-conviction petition that alleges an emerging adult claim is sufficient to begin second-stage proceedings.

22022–2024
People v. Buffer green
ill · 2019
1 sentence

2024The Addison majority further held that “the appellate court correctly remanded the cause for compliance with Rule 651(c) without considering whether the claims in the petition were meritorious.” Id. ¶ 22 In the present case, appointed counsel violated Rule 651(c) by failing to shape the claim into proper form, because, inter alia, counsel failed to allege specific facts in support of the emerging adult claim as required by the Illinois Supreme Court case of People v. House, 2021 IL 125124 , and advanced arguments on an eighth amendment claim that had previously been abandoned following the Ill

12024–2024
People v. House green
illappct · 2015
1 sentence

2022Defendant argues the petition in this case “strongly suggests that his mandatory de facto life sentence was unconstitutional” under the proportionate penalties clause of the Illinois constitution in the light of Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) and People v. House, 2015 IL App (1st) 110580 .

12022–2022
People v. Jennings green
illappct · 2003
1 sentence

2022Accordingly, - 16 - 2022 IL App (2d) 200449-U we cannot find that postconviction counsel rendered unreasonable assistance to petitioner by not raising it. ¶ 45 Petitioner argues for a contrary result, citing People v. Jennings, 345 Ill.

12022–2022

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-1 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check