5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1959–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Craig D.green2 sentences2007See In re Chilean D., 304 Ill. 2007See In re Chilean D., 304 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Foutch v. O'BRYANTgreen2 sentences2025The appellant “has the burden to present a sufficiently complete record of the proceedings at trial to support a claim of error,” and if the appellant fails to provide -3- No. 1-23-1799 such a record, “it will be presumed that the order entered by the trial court was in conformity with law and had a sufficient factual basis.” Foutch v. O’Bryant, 99 Ill. 2d 389, 391-92 (1984). ¶ 11 Ms. Kelly argues that the lack of a transcript does not foreclose our review of the circuit court’s decision because the “failure to present a report of proceedings does not require dismissal or affirmance where the 2025Foutch, 99 Ill. 2d at 392-93 . -5- No. 1-23-1799 ¶ 14 B. | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Iowa Marine Repair Corp.green1 sentence2025In Walker v. Iowa Marine Repair Corporation, 132 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Venturini v. Affatatogreen1 sentence2025The appellant “has the burden to present a sufficiently complete record of the proceedings at trial to support a claim of error,” and if the appellant fails to provide -3- No. 1-23-1799 such a record, “it will be presumed that the order entered by the trial court was in conformity with law and had a sufficient factual basis.” Foutch v. O’Bryant, 99 Ill. 2d 389, 391-92 (1984). ¶ 11 Ms. Kelly argues that the lack of a transcript does not foreclose our review of the circuit court’s decision because the “failure to present a report of proceedings does not require dismissal or affirmance where the | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Redmond v. Socha
green
1 sentence2025This court held that a transcript for the hearing on the post-trial motion was unnecessary because “the record on appeal contain[ed] everything that was before the second judge at the time of his order.” Id. at 228 . ¶ 13 Here, the circuit court may have based its decision to deny Ms. Kelly’s motion in part on considerations not apparent in the record on appeal, such as “the appearance of the witnesses, their manner in testifying, and *** the circumstances aiding in the determination of credibility.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Redmond, 216 Ill. 2d at 632-33 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Seymour v. Collins
green
1 sentence2025“An abuse of discretion occurs only when the trial court’s decision is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable or where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.” Seymour v. Collins, 2015 IL 118432, ¶ 41 . ¶ 10 The appellate record does not contain a transcript of the circuit court’s oral ruling denying Ms. Kelly’s motion for a new trial. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Altek, Inc. v. Vulcan Tube & Metals Co.
green
1 sentence2025This court held that a transcript for the hearing on the post-trial motion was unnecessary because “the record on appeal contain[ed] everything that was before the second judge at the time of his order.” Id. at 228 . ¶ 13 Here, the circuit court may have based its decision to deny Ms. Kelly’s motion in part on considerations not apparent in the record on appeal, such as “the appearance of the witnesses, their manner in testifying, and *** the circumstances aiding in the determination of credibility.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Redmond, 216 Ill. 2d at 632-33 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Rosestone Investments, LLC v. Garner
green
1 sentence2022Garner, 2013 IL App (1st) 123422, ¶ 23 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Kelly v. Chicago Park District
green
2 sentences1959We conclude the rule established in Kelly v. Chicago Park Dist., 409 Ill. 91 , applies here, and that the trial court, instead of holding defendants in contempt, should have made a determination of salary due the petitioner for the period he now seeks, against which credit should have been given to the City for petitioner’s earnings from outside employment. 1959We conclude the rule established in Kelly v. Chicago Park Dist., 409 Ill. 91 , applies here, and that the trial court, instead of holding defendants in contempt, should have made a determination of salary due the petitioner for the period he now seeks, against which credit should have been given to the City for petitioner’s earnings from outside employment. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.