party raises a facial challenge (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

party raises a facial challenge in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Eubanks green
ill · 2019
2 sentences

2025People v. Eubanks, 2019 IL 123525, ¶ 34 .

2025This burden is “particularly heavy” when a party raises a facial challenge to a statute, as “[a] statute will be deemed facially unconstitutional only if there is no set of circumstances under which the statute would be valid.” Id. (citing People v. Eubanks, 2019 IL 123525, ¶ 34 ).

22025–2025
Bartlow v. Costigan green
ill · 2014
2 sentences

2018Bartlow v. Costigan , 2014 IL 115152 , ¶ 18, 383 Ill.Dec. 95 , 13 N.E.3d 1216 .

2018Bartlow v. Costigan , 2014 IL 115152 , ¶ 18, 383 Ill.Dec. 95 , 13 N.E.3d 1216 .

22018–2018
People v. Rizzo green
ill · 2016
1 sentence

2025“If it is reasonably possible to construe the statute in a way that preserves its constitutionality, we must do so.” Id. (citing People v. Rizzo, 2016 IL 118599 , ¶ 24). ¶7 The AHC statute provides that it is a Class X felony to receive, sell, possess, or transfer any firearm if you have previously been convicted of two or more qualifying offenses.1 720 ILCS 5/24- 1.7 (West 2012).

12025–2025
People v. Coty green
ill · 2020
1 sentence

2025This burden is “particularly heavy” when a party raises a facial challenge to a statute, as “[a] statute will be deemed facially unconstitutional only if there is no set of circumstances under which the statute would be valid.” Id. (citing People v. Eubanks, 2019 IL 123525, ¶ 34 ).

12025–2025
People v. Pepitone green
ill · 2018
1 sentence

2021Id.

12021–2021

Where else courts name it

IL 5 (2018–2025) CA 4 (2012–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check