5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Haltermangreen1 sentence2023See People v. Halterman, 45 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re BLS
green
2 sentences2004The State is aware of In re B.L.S., 202 Ill.2d 510 , 270 Ill.Dec. 23 , 782 N.E.2d 217 (2002), but insists the Illinois Supreme Court found that cases involving juvenile commitments for indeterminate periods are distinguishable from habitual-juvenile-offender cases, in which determinate commitments are required. 2004The State is aware of In re B.L.S., 202 Ill.2d 510 , 270 Ill.Dec. 23 , 782 N.E.2d 217 (2002), but insists the Illinois Supreme Court found that cases involving juvenile commitments for indeterminate periods are distinguishable from habitual-juvenile-offender cases, in which determinate commitments are required. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. De La Paz
green
1 sentence2025Section 5-6-4(a) further states, “Personal service of the petition for violation of probation or the issuance of such warrant, summons or notice shall toll the period of probation, conditional discharge, supervision, or sentence of county impact incarceration until the final determination of the charge, and the term of probation, conditional discharge, supervision, or sentence of county impact incarceration shall not run until the hearing and disposition of the petition for violation.” Id. ¶ 24 Here, the record reveals that none of the potential avenues for tolling defendant’s probationary per | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2023The trial court appointed postconviction counsel, who filed an amended petition alleging a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), based on the State’s failure to disclose an agreement with Dowell to dismiss his cases in exchange for his testimony at defendant’s trial. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.