public interest mootness exception (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

public interest mootness exception in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re JWgreen
illappct · 2004 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012See In re J.W., 346 Ill.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. James H. green
illappct · 2010
2 sentences

2011The James court stated that, "[q]uestions of strict compliance with the Code's statutory procedures have been found to involve matters of public importance to which the public-interest mootness exception applies." Id. at 904 , 348 Ill.Dec. 135 , 943 N.E.2d 743 .

2011The James court stated that, "[q]uestions of strict compliance with the Code's statutory procedures have been found to involve matters of public importance to which the public-interest mootness exception applies." Id. at 904 , 348 Ill.Dec. 135 , 943 N.E.2d 743 .

22011–2011
People v. A.W. green
illappct · 2008
1 sentence

2010In re Andrew B., 386 v. App. 3d 337, 340, 896 N.E.2d 1067 , 1070 (2008), citing In re A.W., 381 Ill.

12010–2010
People v. Andrew B. green
illappct · 2008
1 sentence

2010In re Andrew B., 386 Ill.

12010–2010
In Re Andrew B. green
illappct · 2008
1 sentence

2010In re Andrew B., 386 v. App. 3d 337, 340, 896 N.E.2d 1067 , 1070 (2008), citing In re A.W., 381 Ill.

12010–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 405 ILCS 5/3-601 (3) IL § 405 ILCS 5/3-810 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 5 (2010–2012) MO 2 (2019–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check