Cases pin-citing Rodriguez · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Rodriguez

Cases pin-citing Rodriguez

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez  ·  1973  ·  110 pinpoint citations from 42 cases, 30 distinct passages.

Nelson v. Nazareth Independent School District  ·  2024-09-06  ·  N.D. Texas  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
“Education, though undeniably important, is a matter of governmental policy rather than a fundamental right.”
Jones v. County of Westchester  ·  2023-09-15  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution.”
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization  ·  2022-06-24  ·  Supreme Court  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
“financing public edu- cation”
Western Growers Association v. City of Coachella  ·  2021-07-12  ·  C.D. California  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
“[w]ealth is not a suspect category in Equal Protection 25 jurisprudence”
State v. Jeter  ·  2021-06-30  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  pin 93 S. Ct. at 1278
“[A] suspect class is one ‘saddled with such disabilities, or subjected to such a history of purposeful unequal treatment, or relegated Case No. 19 JE 0016 –8– to such a position of political powerlessness as to command extraordinary protection from the majoritarian political process.’”
Promote the Vote v. Secretary of State  ·  2020-07-20  ·  Michigan Court of Appeals  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 16
“[T]he right to vote, per se, is not a constitutionally protected right . . . .”
Fiedler v. Stroudsburg Area School District  ·  2019-12-09  ·  M.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
“Education . . . is not among the rights afforded 16 explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected.”
Manning v. Caldwell for City of Roanoke  ·  2019-07-16  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"[W]e do no violence to the values of federalism and separation of powers by staying our hand."
Lori Wash. ex rel. J.W. v. Katy Indep. Sch. Dist.  ·  2019-06-05  ·  S.D. Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is so implicitly protected."
Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. Hill  ·  2019-05-31  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"It is not the province of this Court to create substantive constitutional rights in the name of guaranteeing equal protection of the laws."
Asah v. N.J. Dep't of Educ.  ·  2018-07-27  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected."
ODonnell v. Harris County  ·  2017-04-28  ·  S.D. Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“neither prisoners nor indigents constitute a suspect class”
DeLaTorre v. Minnesota State High School League  ·  2016-08-16  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected.”
League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Education Network, Inc. v. Scott Walker  ·  2014-07-31  ·  Wisconsin Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
"[T]he right to vote, per se, is not a [federal] constitutionally protected right."
Errol Houston, Jr. v. New Orleans City  ·  2012-03-14  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“strict judicial scrutiny [has been found] appropriate in reviewing legislative judgments that interfere with fundamental constitutional rights”
Pereira v. State Bd. of Educ.  ·  2012-02-28  ·  Supreme Court of Connecticut  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"[t]he persistence of attachment to government at the lowest level where education is concerned reflects the depth of commitment of its supporters"
Kirby v. Loyalsock Township School District  ·  2011-09-06  ·  M.D. Pennsylvania  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“We have carefully considered each of the arguments supportive of the District Court’s finding that education is a fundamental right or liberty and have found those arguments unpersuasive.”
Murrell v. People  ·  2010-09-13  ·  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected.”
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Seligman Unified School Dist. No. 40  ·  2009-10-08  ·  D. Arizona  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected.”
G.C. Ex Rel. Counts v. North Clackamas School District  ·  2009-08-21  ·  D. Oregon  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution”
James v. Williams  ·  2008-01-10  ·  Supreme Court of Arkansas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected."
In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71  ·  2007-07-18  ·  Michigan Supreme Court  ·  4 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"[T]he right to vote, per se, is not a constitutionally protected right. . . . "
Richards v. CITY OF NEW YORK 405  ·  2006-06-15  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution.”
Handberry v. Thompson  ·  2006-04-04  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution."
Handberry v. Thompson  ·  2006-01-17  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution.”
Handberry v. Thompson  ·  2006-01-17  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution.”
Cavalier v. Caddo Parish  ·  2005-03-30  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 16
"This case ... involves the most persistent and difficult questions of educational policy, another area in which this Court's lack of specialized knowledge and experience counsels against premature interference with the informed judgments made at the state and local levels."
Shapiro v. Berger  ·  2004-08-05  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“[T]he right to vote, per se, is not a constitutionally protected right ... ”
Gomes v. University of Maine System  ·  2004-02-23  ·  D. Maine  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected”
Bacon v. Lee  ·  2001-08-02  ·  Supreme Court of North Carolina  ·  pin 411 U.S. at 1
“It is not the province of this Court to create substantive constitutional rights in the name of guaranteeing equal protection of the laws.”
P.G. v. Ramsey County  ·  2001-04-27  ·  D. Minnesota  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“Education, of course, is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution. Nor do we find any basis for saying it is implicitly so protected.”
Frazier v. City of Grand Ledge, MI  ·  2001-03-19  ·  W.D. Michigan  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“No Court has ever declared that handicapped persons constitute a suspect class for purposes of equal protection.”
City of Tucson v. Pima County  ·  2001-03-15  ·  Court of Appeals of Arizona  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“[T]he right to vote, per se, is not a constitutionally protected right.”
Coalition of New Jersey Sportsmen, Inc. v. Whitman  ·  1999-03-31  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“The system uf alleged discrimination and the class it defines have none of the traditional indicia of suspectness”
Robinson v. Fauver  ·  1996-07-19  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“[W]here wealth is involved, the Equal Protection Clause does not require absolute equality or precisely equal advantages.”
Johnson v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services  ·  1995-05-04  ·  D. Maryland  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“[A]t least where wealth is involved, the Equal Protection Clause does not require absolute equality or precisely equal advantages.”
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School District  ·  1992-01-30  ·  Texas Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 411 S. Ct. at 1
"[T]he extent to which the quality of education varies with expenditure per pupil is debated inconclusively by the most thoughtful students of public education"
Josie Jaimes v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority  ·  1985-06-24  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
"This Court has never heretofore held that wealth discrimination alone provides an adequate basis for invoking strict scrutiny ..."
Jaimes v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority  ·  1985-03-25  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“This Court has never heretofore held that wealth discrimination alone provides an adequate basis for invoking strict scrutiny ... ”
United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven  ·  1980-02-19  ·  Supreme Court of Connecticut  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“[t]he constitutional standard under the Equal Protection Clause is whether the challenged state action rationally furthers a legitimate state purpose or interest”
NAACP v. Allen  ·  1974-04-19  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 36 L. Ed. 2d at 1
“It is not the province of this court to create substantive constitutional rights in the name of guaranteeing equal protection of the laws.”
Page 1 of 3   Next →