Cases pin-citing Franks · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Franks

Cases pin-citing Franks

Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.  ·  1976  ·  38 pinpoint citations from 15 cases, 12 distinct passages.

Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Qwest Corp.  ·  2017-11-03  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 424 U.S. at 747
“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. . . . The courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief.”
Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Qwest Corp.  ·  2017-11-03  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. ... The courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief.”
Arizona Ex Rel Thomas Horne v. the Geo Group  ·  2016-03-14  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 47 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“Th[e] -justification [that unnamed class members had not filed administrative charges] for denying class-based relief in Title VII suits has been unanimously rejected by the courts of appeals, and Congress ratified that construction by the 1972 [Title VII] amendments.”
Musto v. Transport Workers Union of America  ·  2011-08-25  ·  E.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“More than any other provision of the collective-bargaining agreement seniority affects the economic security of the individual employee covered by its terms.”
Ingram v. Coca-Cola Co.  ·  2001-06-07  ·  N.D. Georgia  ·  pin 47 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“ ‘Once purposeful discrimination against a class is proved, a presumption of an entitlement to back pay and individual injunctive relief arises with respect to the members of that class.’ ”
Sands v. Runyon  ·  1994-07-01  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“The fashioning of appropriate remedies [for employment discrimination] invokes the sound equitable discretion of the district courts.”
Sands v. Runyon  ·  1994-07-01  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
"The fashioning of appropriate remedies [for employment discrimination] invokes the sound equitable discretion of the district courts."
Michael E. Hubbard v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Michael E. Hubbard v. Environmental Protection Agency  ·  1992-11-27  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
"the District Court declined, however, to grant the unnamed members of classes 3 and 4 any other specific relief sought, which included an award of backpay"
Michael E. Hubbard v. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael E. Hubbard v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency  ·  1992-03-02  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
"the District Court declined, however, to grant the unnamed members of classes 3 and 4 any other specific relief sought, which included an award of backpay"
Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.  ·  1988-09-21  ·  Eleventh Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“The underlying legal wrong affecting [the class] is not the alleged operation of a racially discriminatory seniority system but of a racially discriminatory hiring system.”
Firefighters Inc. for Racial Equality v. Bach  ·  1985-06-11  ·  D. Colorado  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“the thrust [of § 703(h)] is directed toward defining what is and what is not an illegal discriminatory practice____”
Aljoe Poindexter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation  ·  1984-06-26  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  pin 47 L. Ed. 2d at 444
"Discretion is vested not for purposes of 'limit[ing] appellate review of trial courts, or ... invit[ing] inconsistency and caprice,' but rather to allow the most complete achievement of the objectives of Title VII that is attainable under the facts and circumstances of the specific case."
Murnane v. American Airlines, Inc.  ·  1981-10-01  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 424 L. Ed. 2d at 444
“[Defendant] may attempt to prove that a given individual .. . was not in fact discriminatorily refused employment. ... [E]vidence indicating the individual’s lack of qualification .. . would of course be relevant.”