Cases pin-citing Shalala · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Shalala

Cases pin-citing Shalala

Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital  ·  1995  ·  50 pinpoint citations from 18 cases, 16 distinct passages.

Wide Voice, LLC v. FCC  ·  2023-03-09  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 514 U.S. at 87
“The APA does not require that all the specific applications of a rule evolve by further, more precise rules rather than by adjudication. . .”
Azar v. Allina Health Services  ·  2019-06-03  ·  Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"Interpretive rules do not require notice and comment"
M.L. Johnson Family Props., LLC v. Zinke  ·  2018-03-21  ·  E.D. Kentucky  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"Internal operating manuals ... do not carry the force of law, bind the agency, or confer rights."
Alameda Health Sys. v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.  ·  2017-12-18  ·  N.D. California  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"Interpretive rules ... do not have the force and effect of law and are not accorded that weight in the adjudicatory process...."
Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal  ·  2017-10-04  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The APA does not require that all the specific applications of a rule evolve by further, more precise rules rather than by adjudication.”
Ohio Dep't of Medicaid v. Thomas Price  ·  2017-07-24  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 131 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The APA does not require that all the specific applications of a rule evolve by further, more precise rules rather than adjudication.”
Texas Children's Hospital v. Burwell  ·  2014-12-29  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“APA rulemaking would still be required if [the agency’s Medicare reimbursement calculation] adopted a new position inconsistent with ... existing regulations”
Southern Rehabilitation Group, P.L.L.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human Services  ·  2013-10-18  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Interpretive rules do not require notice and comment, ... they also do not have the force and effect of law and are not accorded that weight in the adjudicatory process.”
Almy v. Sebelius  ·  2010-10-29  ·  D. Maryland  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The Secretary’s mode of determining *328 benefits by both rulemaking and adjudication is, in our view, a proper exercise of her statutory mandate”
Miller v. California Speedway Corp.  ·  2006-09-08  ·  C.D. California  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“APA rulemaking would still be required if [an agency] adopted a new position inconsistent with any of the [agency’s] existing regulations.”
Alaska Department of Health & Social Services v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services  ·  2005-09-12  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"[There is no] basis for suggesting that the Secretary has a statutory duty to promulgate regulations that ... address every conceivable question in the process of determining equitable reimbursement."
Alaska Department Of Health And Social Services v. Centers For Medicare And Medicaid Services  ·  2005-09-12  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"[There is no] basis for suggesting that the Secretary has a statutory duty to promulgate regulations that . . . address every conceivable question in the process of determining equitable reimbursement."
Select Specialty Hospital of Atlanta v. Thompson  ·  2003-11-18  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“The APA does not require that all the specific applications of a rule evolve by further, more precise rules rather than by adjudication.”
Monahan v. Winn  ·  2003-08-12  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“[Legislative rules are binding on courts as an extension of legislative power, whereas interpretative rules have only the effect courts choose to give them.”
Hemp Industries Ass'n v. Drug Enforcement Administration  ·  2003-06-30  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Interpretive rules ... do not have the force and effect of law and are not accorded that weight in the adjudicatory process .... ”
Hemp Industries Association v. Drug Enforcement Administration  ·  2003-06-30  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
"Interpretive rules... do not have the force and effect of law and are not accorded that weight in the adjudicatory process...."
Lamb v. Qualex Incorporated  ·  2002-04-03  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 87
“Interpretive rules ... do not have the force and effect of law, and are not accorded that weight in the adjudicatory process.”
Kevin UPTON, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent  ·  1996-01-18  ·  Second Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 115 L. Ed. 2d at 106
“The APA does not require that all the specific applications of a rule evolve by further, more precise rules rather than by adjudication.”