Cases pin-citing Policy Management · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Policy Management

Cases pin-citing Policy Management

Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.  ·  1999  ·  37 pinpoint citations from 16 cases, 16 distinct passages.

Phillips v. Jackson Public School District  ·  2023-11-09  ·  S.D. Mississippi  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“An ADA plaintiff bears the burden of proving that she is a ‘qualified individual with a disability’— that is, a person ‘who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions’ of her job.”
(SS) Lazar v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-09-30  ·  E.D. California  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“Cleveland”
Rose v. University Hospitals  ·  2020-12-14  ·  N.D. Ohio  ·  pin 526 U.S. at 795
“Neither application for nor receipt of social security benefits is by itself conclusive evidence that an individual is completely incapable of working.”
Lohse v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2020-09-22  ·  C.D. Illinois  ·  pin 526 U.S. at 795
“For example, since the Social Security Administration (SSA) does not take into account the possibility of ‘reasonable accommodation’ in determining SSDI eligibility . . . .”
Cahill v. O'Rourke  ·  2019-09-27  ·  D. Massachusetts  ·  pin 526 U.S. at 795
“This misreads (and would read out of the law) Cleveland’s reasoned explanation requirement.”
Larry R. Bingman v. Baltimore County  ·  2017-12-29  ·  Fourth Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 966
“In our view, ... despite the appearance of conflict that arises from the language of the two statutes, the two claims do not inherently conflict to the point where courts should apply a special negative presumption like the one applied by the Court of Appeals here.”
Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated  ·  2015-10-02  ·  Federal Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“a party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his or her own previous sworn statement ... without explaining the contradiction or at least attempting to resolve the disparity”
Montage Furniture Services, LLC v. Regency Furniture, Inc.  ·  2013-09-04  ·  D. Maryland  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“[A] party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his or her own previous ... statement ____ without explaining the contradiction or attempting to resolve the disparity.”
Rhonda Theus v. Glaxosmithkline  ·  2011-11-30  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“[A] party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his or her own previous sworn statement. ... ”
Cottrell v. Rowan University  ·  2011-04-05  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“An ADA plaintiff bears the burden of proving that she is a ‘qualified individual with a disability.’ ”
Cato v. FIRST FEDERAL COMMUNITY BANK  ·  2009-11-05  ·  E.D. Texas  ·  pin 143 L. Ed. 2d at 966
“[Cato] advised there was ‘no way’ she could return to work at that time .... ”
McFadden v. Ballard, Spahr, Andrews, & Ingersoll, LLP  ·  2008-09-30  ·  District of Columbia  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“[A]n ADA plaintiff cannot simply ignore her SSDI contention that she was too disabled to work [S]he must explain why that SSDI contention is consistent with her ADA claim....”
Andersen v. Lindenbaum  ·  2007-06-11  ·  Supreme Court of Colorado  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
"[The lower courts] have held with virtual unanimity that a party cannot create a genuine issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment simply by contradicting his or her own previous sworn statement."
James W. Moore v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Being Sued as Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner Social Security Administration  ·  2002-01-24  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“Improvement in a totally disabled person’s condition, while permitting that person to work, will not necessarily or immediately lead the SSA to terminate [disability] benefits.”
Gonzalez v. Bratton  ·  2001-06-13  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 119 L. Ed. 2d at 795
“if an individual has merely applied for, but has not been awarded, SSDI benefits, any inconsistency in the theory of the claims is of the sort normally tolerated by our legal system.”
Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.  ·  1999-06-14  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  pin 119 S. Ct. at 1597
“The ADA seeks to eliminate unwarranted discrimination against disabled individuals in order both to guarantee those individuals equal opportunity and to provide the Nation with the benefit of their consequently increased productivity.”