Cases pin-citing Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Cases pin-citing Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission  ·  1976  ·  3 pinpoint citations from 2 cases, 2 distinct passages.

U S West Communications, Inc. v. Public Service Commission  ·  1995-07-13  ·  Utah Supreme Court  ·  pin 97 Idaho at 832
“The reason for this distinction between affiliate and non-affiliate expenditures appears to be that the probability of unwarranted expenditures corresponds to the probability of collusion.”
Hayden Pines Water Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission  ·  1986-07-15  ·  Idaho Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 97 Idaho at 832
"What is essential are sufficient findings to permit the reviewing court to determine that the Commission has acted non-arbitrarily."