Cases pin-citing Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary Dept. of Health and Human Services · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary Dept. of Health and Human Services

Cases pin-citing Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary Dept. of Health and Human Services

Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary Dept. of Health and Human Services  ·  1985  ·  2 pinpoint citations from 2 cases, 2 distinct passages.

Conocophillips Petrozuata BV v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela  ·  2024-12-05  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 771 F.2d at 682
“Claim preclusion refers to the preclusive effect of a judgment in barring relitigation of the same causes of action.”
In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.  ·  2018-01-02  ·  E.D. Pennsylvania  ·  pin 771 F.2d at 682
" Res judicata , or claim preclusion, is a court-created rule that is designed to draw a line between the meritorious claim on the one hand and the vexatious, repetitious and needless claim on the other hand."