Estate of Donovan L. Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio  ·  2025-11-07  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“When a district court resolves an issue, the losing party can challenge it.”

United States v. Adam Lang  ·  2024-05-30  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“[T]here can be no forfeiture where the district court . . . addressed the merits of the issue.”

Lyle Heyward v. Heather Cooper  ·  2023-12-13  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“When a district court resolves an issue, the losing party can challenge it.”

Laura Hudak v. Elmcroft of Sagamore Hills  ·  2023-01-23  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“When a district court resolves an issue, the losing party can challenge it. Otherwise, the more surprising a district court decision in terms of resolving unbriefed and unargued points, the more insulated from review that decision would be.”

Paul Harcz, Jr. v. Brody Boucher  ·  2019-02-26  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“The only paragraph in which [the plaintiff] discusses conspiracy is vague and consists primarily of legal conclusions . . . .”

Patrick v. Success Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.  ·  2018-12-14  ·  E.D. New York  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

"Any greater process provided by a state, such as review by a school board, is completely gratuitous. Any such additional procedural protections are not required by due process nor do they give rise to any due process rights."

Roberts v. Capital One, N.A.  ·  2017-12-01  ·  Second Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“When a district court resolves an issue, the losing party can challenge it. Otherwise, the more surprising a district court decision in terms of resolving unbriefed and unargued points, the more insulated from review that decision would be.”

United States v. Dwight Bullard  ·  2016-08-25  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“[T]here can be no forfeiture where the district court . . . addressed the merits of the issue.”

United States v. Mickey Fugate  ·  2012-09-07  ·  Sixth Circuit  ·  pin 655 F.3d at 556

“[T]here can be no forfeiture where the district court [despite a party’s failure to press an argument,] addressed the merits of the issue.”