Cases pin-citing Lopez · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Lopez

Cases pin-citing Lopez

Lopez v. Jet Blue Airways  ·  2011  ·  16 pinpoint citations from 16 cases, 6 distinct passages.

United States v. Reardon  ·  2024-08-05  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"A sentencing court is under a mandate to consider a myriad of relevant factors, but the weighting of those factors is largely within the court's informed discretion."
United States v. Carmona-Alomar  ·  2024-07-22  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Vinas  ·  2024-07-01  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Candelario  ·  2024-06-24  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Wright  ·  2024-05-10  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach - 22 - to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Santiago-Lozada  ·  2023-07-27  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Ruperto-Rivera  ·  2021-10-12  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make [his] sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Pupo  ·  2021-04-20  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Alexander  ·  2020-04-30  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Guzman-Vazquez  ·  2019-08-19  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable."
United States v. Vargas-Gonzalez  ·  2019-04-19  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
"[T]he weighting of [the section 3553(a)] factors is largely within the court's informed discretion."
United States v. Coombs  ·  2017-05-19  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
“A sentencing court is under a mandate to consider a myriad of relevant factors, but the weighting of those factors is largely within the court’s informed discretion.”
United States v. Houston  ·  2017-05-19  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
“A sentencing court is under a mandate to consider a myriad of relevant factors, but the weighting of those factors is largely within the court’s informed discretion.”
United States v. Cancel-Zapata  ·  2016-05-13  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
“That the sentencing court chose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make the sentence unreasonable.”
United States v. Pantojas-Cruz  ·  2015-08-28  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
“That the sentencing court choose not to attach to certain of the mitigating factors the significance that the appellant thinks they deserved does not make .the sentence unreasonable.”
United States v. Arroyo-Maldonado  ·  2015-07-01  ·  First Circuit  ·  pin 662 F.3d at 593
“A sentencing court is under a mandate to consider a myriad of relevant factors, but the weighting of those factors is largely within the court’s informed discretion.”