Cases pin-citing cluster 653703 · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing cluster 653703

Cases pin-citing cluster 653703

 ·  1993  ·  10 pinpoint citations from 10 cases, 10 distinct passages.

Rhinehart v. Montgomery  ·  2025-08-19  ·  S.D. California  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Summary judgment is not precluded simply because there is a dispute of 1 some facts in a case.”
Bell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.  ·  2024-06-11  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“School District No. 1J”
The Estate of Elisa Serna v. County of San Diego  ·  2024-03-05  ·  S.D. California  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) 6 presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial 7 decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling 8 ||law.”
(PC) Taylor v. Carbullido  ·  2024-02-05  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“The overwhelming weight of authority is that the failure to file documents 3 in an original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into ‘newly discovered 4 evidence.’”
Krabach v. King County  ·  2024-01-30  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“The overwhelming weight of authority is that the failure to file documents in 15 on original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into ‘newly discovered 16 evidence.’”
Castellanos v. City of Reno  ·  2024-01-22  ·  D. Nevada  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented 24 with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.”
Bigelow v. Great American Insurance Company  ·  2023-05-24  ·  D. Hawaii  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court . . . committed clear error . . . .”
Fatai v. City and County Honolulu  ·  2022-07-11  ·  D. Hawaii  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court . . . committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust . . . .”
Redisegno.com, S.A. de C.V. v. Barracuda Networks, Inc.  ·  2022-04-25  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“The overwhelming 2 weight of authority is that failure to file documents in an original motion or opposition does not 3 turn the late filed documents into ‘newly discovered evidence.’”
Mekhalian v. Astrue  ·  2008-02-29  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 5 F.3d at 1255
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.”