Cases pin-citing Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Cases pin-citing Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee  ·  1995  ·  25 pinpoint citations from 25 cases, 25 distinct passages.

Alexander Vega v. Carolyn Colvin  ·  2025-08-04  ·  C.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving 14 conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities.”
Mattson v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2025-03-24  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“[R]eports of the nonexamining advisor . . . may serve as substantial 21 evidence when they are supported by other evidence in the record and are consistent with it.”
Frost v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2025-02-07  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“[T]he report of a nonexamining, nontreating physician need not 14 be discounted when it is not contradicted by all other evidence in the record.”
(SS) Siqueiros v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2024-05-14  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, 19 resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We must uphold the 20 ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2024-05-07  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for 8 . . . resolving ambiguities.”
(SS) Bronson v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2024-04-04  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ 19 is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for 20 resolving ambiguities. We must uphold the ALJ’s decision where the evidence is susceptible to 21 more than one rational interpretation.”
(SS) Sheppard v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2024-03-08  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining 8 credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We must 9 uphold the ALJ’s decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 10 interpretation.”
(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2023-06-08  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in 23 medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We must uphold the ALJ’s decision where the 24 evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
(SS) Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-08-30  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical 13 testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We must uphold the ALJ’s decision where the evidence 14 is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
(SS) Lee Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-05-19  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“We must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible 14 to more than one rational interpretation.”
(SS) Limon v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-04-25  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. 12 We must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 13 interpretation.”
(SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-04-18  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving 27 ambiguities. We must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
Janssen v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2022-03-08  ·  D. Idaho  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. [Courts] must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
Helm v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2021-12-16  ·  W.D. Washington  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving 24 1 conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities.”
Mary Linda Robinson v. Andrew Saul  ·  2021-03-30  ·  C.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“Reports of the nonexamining advisor need not be 7 discounted and may serve as substantial evidence when they are supported by other 8 evidence in the record and are consistent with it”
(SS) Quintana v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2021-03-24  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for 3 determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We 4 must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 5 interpretation.”
Kramer v. Kijakazi  ·  2021-03-08  ·  E.D. Washington  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in 5 medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities.”
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration  ·  2021-03-02  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for 15 determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving 16 ambiguities. [Courts] must uphold the ALJ’s decision where the evidence is susceptible to 17 more than one rational interpretation.”
Riggs v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration  ·  2020-11-25  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. [Courts] must uphold the ALJ’s decision 27 where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2020-11-05  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for 5 determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We 6 must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 7 interpretation.”
(SS) Michael Digiacomo v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2020-10-28  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical 27 testimony, and for resolving ambiguities. We must uphold the ALJ's decision where the evidence is 28 susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
Lockwood v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration  ·  2020-09-03  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is 2 responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for 3 resolving ambiguities. [Courts] must uphold the ALJ’s decision where the evidence is 4 susceptible to more than one rational interpretation.”
Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration  ·  2020-03-17  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving 11 conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities.”
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration  ·  2019-11-15  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The 5 ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, 6 and for resolving ambiguities.”
Delia v. Commissioner of Social Security  ·  2019-09-23  ·  D. Idaho  ·  pin 53 F.3d at 1035
“The ALJ is responsible for determining credibility, resolving conflicts in medical testimony, and for resolving ambiguities.”