Telep v. Stickney  ·  2024-05-10  ·  D. Maryland  ·  pin 137 F.3d at 1275

“Plaintiff . . . was never convicted and, therefore, did not suffer the effects of an unfair trial. As such, the facts of this case do not implicate the protections of Brady.”

Lewis v. Williamson County, Texas  ·  2022-12-20  ·  W.D. Texas  ·  pin 137 F.3d at 1275

“Plaintiff, however, was never convicted and, therefore, did not suffer the effects of an unfair trial. As such, the facts of this case do not implicate the protections of Brady.”

Kastis v. Alvarado  ·  2020-05-13  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 137 F.3d at 1275

“Plaintiff . . . was never 1 convicted and, therefore, did not suffer the effects of an unfair trial. As such, the facts of this case 2 do not implicate the protections of Brady.”

Michael Telzer v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs  ·  2019-08-12  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 137 F.3d at 1275

“Plaintiff, however, was never convicted and, therefore, did not suffer 10 the effects of an unfair trial. As such, the facts of this case do not implicate the protections of Brady.”

Montgomery v. District of Columbia  ·  2019-08-05  ·  District of Columbia  ·  pin 137 F.3d at 1275

“Plaintiff . . . was never convicted and, therefore, did not suffer the effects of an unfair trial. As such, the facts of this case do not implicate the protections of Brady.”