Adderley v. Preferred Primary Care Associates LLC  ·  2025-08-25  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”

Tynes v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice  ·  2025-02-13  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”

Dominguez v. Metro Preventive Plumbing Maintenance Inc.  ·  2024-10-25  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”

Sanchez v. Bobo Intriguing Objects, LLC  ·  2024-05-23  ·  N.D. Georgia  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“Those opposing fee applications have obligations . . . [and] ‘objections and proof from fee opponents’ concerning hours that should be excluded must be specific and ‘reasonably precise.’”

Munch v. M/V FOXIE  ·  2021-06-23  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“[C]ourts are not authorized to be generous with the money of others, and it is as much the duty of courts to see that excessive fees and expenses are not awarded as it is to see that an adequate amount is awarded.”

Ofarrill v. MMDO Corp.  ·  2020-04-30  ·  S.D. Florida  ·  pin 168 F.3d at 423

“The fee applicant bears the burden of establishing entitlement and documenting the appropriate hours and hourly rates.”