Wilson v. State  ·  2025-06-24  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“[T]he rule is simple: if a rule in the new Evidence Code is materially identical to a Federal Rule of Evidence, we look to federal case law.”

Smith v. State  ·  2024-04-30  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“[S]tatements made to a pro- vider for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment may be admissible because the self-interested motivation of the declarant in wanting effective diagnosis or treatment . . . makes it more likely that the statements made for that purpose are true.”

Antonios Thomas v. State  ·  2024-01-04  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“[i]f a rule in the new Evidence Code is materially identical to a Federal Rule of Evidence, we look to federal case law.”

Whitaker Farms, LLC v. Fitzgerald Fruit Farms, LLC  ·  2023-06-29  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“The General Assembly was crystal clear in conveying its intent that Georgia’s new Evidence Code was primarily enacted to adopt the Federal Rules of Evidence.”

Williams v. State  ·  2023-05-16  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“if a rule in the new Evidence Code is materially identical to a Federal Rule of Evidence, we look to federal case law”

Joseph Stockert v. Brydan Rogers  ·  2021-10-08  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“if a rule in the new Evidence Code is materially identical to a Federal Rule of Evidence, we look to federal case law”

FRANKLIN v. the STATE.  ·  2019-07-01  ·  Court of Appeals of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

"if a rule in the new Evidence Code is materially identical to a Federal Rule of Evidence, we look to federal case law"

Grant v. State  ·  2019-02-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“If there is no materially identical Federal Rule of Evidence and a provision of the old Evidence Code was retained in the new Code, our case law interpreting the former provision applies.”

Winters v. State  ·  2019-02-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

“If there is no materially identical Federal Rule of Evidence and a provision of the old Evidence Code was retained in the new Code, our case law interpreting that former provision applies.”

Winters v. State  ·  2019-02-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 304 Ga. at 1

"If there is no materially identical Federal Rule of Evidence and a provision of the old Evidence Code was retained in the new Code, our case law interpreting that former provision applies."

Grant v. State  ·  2019-02-18  ·  Supreme Court of Georgia  ·  pin 820 S.E.2d at 1

"If there is no materially identical Federal Rule of Evidence and a provision of the old Evidence Code was retained in the new Code, our case law interpreting the former provision applies."