Husain v. Warren  ·  2022-09-23  ·  District of Columbia  ·  pin 156 F.3d at 1284

“[Plaintiff] had an obligation to demonstrate that there existed some vacant position to which he could have been reassigned.”

Lannan Found. v. Gingold  ·  2017-10-25  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  pin 156 F.3d at 1284

"We assume that the parties intended for every part of the agreement to have meaning; interpretations that would render a portion of the agreement ineffective or mere surplusage are traditionally disfavored by courts."

Iyoha v. Architect of the Capitol  ·  2017-10-25  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  pin 156 F.3d at 1284

"A plaintiff attacking a qualifications-based explanation is of course not limited to comparing his qualifications against those of the successful candidate[s]. The plaintiff can instead seek to expose other flaws in the employer's explanation."