Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden  ·  2025-02-21  ·  C.D. California  ·  pin 217 F.3d at 1060

“[T]he 19 impossibility of making an exact apportionment does not relieve the district court of 20 its duty to make some attempt to adjust the fee award in an effort to reflect an 21 apportionment.”

4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co., Inc.  ·  2019-08-08  ·  Second Circuit  ·  pin 217 F.3d at 1060

"While actual confusion may be relevant as evidence of the likelihood of confusion (which is required for an award of profits ...)[,] a showing of actual confusion is not necessary to obtain a recovery of profits."

Teresa Hipple v. SCIX LLC  ·  2019-07-05  ·  Third Circuit  ·  pin 217 F.3d at 1060

“[T]he district court erred in refusing to cancel a mark found to be invalid.”

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.  ·  2009-03-25  ·  D. New Jersey  ·  pin 217 F.3d at 1060

"A defendant's profits can only be disgorged to prevent unjust enrichment if the trademark infringement was willful."