Cases pin-citing Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Luigino's, Inc.
Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Luigino's, Inc. · 2005 · 16 pinpoint citations from 16 cases, 5 distinct passages.
Home Life Health Care, LLC v. Dorfman
· 2025-09-24 · E.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
UGX Brands, LLC v. The City of Norfolk
· 2025-07-24 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Harrison v. Local One, International Union of Elevator Constructors of New York and New Jersey, AFL-CIO
· 2025-04-05 · E.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Beyond Gravity Sweden AB v. Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company
· 2025-02-19 · D. Connecticut · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Wee Care Nanny Agency, LLC v. WeeCare, Inc.
· 2023-05-30 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Christmas House USA Inc. v. ChristmasLand Experience LLP
· 2022-12-22 · E.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction”
Two Hands IP LLC v. Two Hands America, Inc.
· 2021-09-29 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Borland
· 2021-09-15 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“The decision whether to modify a preliminary injunction involves an exercise of the same discretion that a court employs in an initial decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction.”
Omni Elevator Corporation v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
· 2021-08-27 · W.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Omni Elevator Corporation v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
· 2021-08-26 · W.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Purgess v. Parauda
· 2021-06-03 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
3M Company v. CovCare, Inc.
· 2021-05-05 · E.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“A plaintiff who establishes that an infringer’s use of its trademark creates a likelihood of consumer confusion generally is entitled to a presumption of irreparable injury.”
Joshi v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
· 2020-08-31 · S.D. New York · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
Coscarelli v. Esquared Hospitality LLC
· 2019-01-31 · S.D. Illinois · pin 423 F.3d at 137
"We have found delays of as little as ten weeks sufficient to defeat the presumption of irreparable harm that is essential to the issuance of a preliminary injunction."
CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. BMF Wheels, Inc.
· 2015-07-13 · Sixth Circuit · pin 423 F.3d at 137
“Where ... an infringer attempts to avoid a substantial likelihood of consumer confusion by adding a disclaimer, it must establish the disclaimer’s effectiveness.”