Arizona School Boards Association Incorporated v. Copper State Education Alliance Incorporated  ·  2024-12-05  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“It is well 4 established in patent and copyright law that a patent or copyright licensee may not sub- 5 license his licensed intellectual property rights without express permission from the 6 licensor.”

White v. County of Hawaii  ·  2023-07-12  ·  D. Hawaii  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“Only admissible evidence may be considered in deciding a motion for summary judgment.”

Advanced Risk Managers, LLC v. Equinox Management Group, Inc.  ·  2022-02-18  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“[i]f, 5 after considering the language of the contract and any admissible extrinsic evidence, the meaning 6 of the contract is unambiguous, a court may properly interpret it on a motion for summary 7 judgment.”

McDonald v. United States Postal Service  ·  2022-01-21  ·  D. Arizona  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“A fact is material if it could affect the outcome of the suit under 26 the governing substantive law.”

Microsoft Corporation v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.  ·  2020-08-25  ·  N.D. California  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“If, after considering the language of the contract and any admissible 25 extrinsic evidence, the meaning of the contract is unambiguous, a court may properly interpret it 26 on a motion for summary judgment.”

Zuma Press, Inc. v. Getty Images (US), Inc.  ·  2019-07-01  ·  S.D. New York  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“It is well established in... copyright law that a... copyright licensee may not sub-license his licensed intellectual property rights without express permission from the licensor.”

Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. Cosmetic Warriors Ltd.  ·  2018-06-29  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“It is well established that laches is a valid defense to Lanham Act claims for both monetary damages and injunctive relief.”

Leslie v. Hancock Park Capital II, L.P. (In Re Fitness Holdings International, Inc.)  ·  2016-11-08  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“Because California law recognizes that the words of a written instrument often lack a clear meaning apart from the context in which the words were written, courts may preliminarily consider any extrinsic evidence offered by the parties”

Derek and Constance Lee Corp. v. Kim Seng Company  ·  2012-02-01  ·  Ninth Circuit  ·  pin 454 F.3d at 975

“A defendant may establish prejudice by showing that during the delay, it invested money to expand 2 its business or entered into business transactions based on his presumed rights.”