Cases pin-citing Ohio v. Clark
Ohio v. Clark · 2015 · 7 pinpoint citations from 7 cases, 6 distinct passages.
Thayer v. United States
· 2024-08-30 · D. Nevada · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“‘[W]itnesses,’ under the Confrontation Clause, are those ‘who bear 19 testimony[.]’”
State v. Lucas
· 2024-03-07 · Ohio Court of Appeals · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“A formal station-house interrogation * * * is more likely to provoke testimonial statements, while less formal questioning is less likely to reflect a primary purpose aimed at obtaining testimonial evidence against the accused.”
State v. Tsosie
· 2022-07-14 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common sense that the relationship between a student and his teacher is very different from that between a citizen and the police. We do not ignore that reality.”
State v. Tsosie
· 2022-07-14 · New Mexico Supreme Court · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common 5 sense that the relationship between a student and his teacher is very different from 6 that between a citizen and the police. We do not ignore that reality.”
State v. Ford
· 2021-09-03 · Ohio Court of Appeals · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“A formal station-house interrogation * * * is more likely to provoke testimonial statements, while less formal questioning is less likely to reflect a primary purpose aimed at obtaining testimonial evidence against the accused.”
State v. Clark
· 2021-08-12 · Ohio Court of Appeals · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“Clark III”
State v. Freeman
· 2021-01-19 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common sense that the relationship . . . is very different from that between a citizen and the police.”