Cases pin-citing Ohio v. Clark · Go Syfert

Cases pin-citing Ohio v. Clark

Ohio v. Clark  ·  2015  ·  7 pinpoint citations from 7 cases, 6 distinct passages.


Thayer v. United States  ·  2024-08-30  ·  D. Nevada  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“‘[W]itnesses,’ under the Confrontation Clause, are those ‘who bear 19 testimony[.]’”
State v. Lucas  ·  2024-03-07  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“A formal station-house interrogation * * * is more likely to provoke testimonial statements, while less formal questioning is less likely to reflect a primary purpose aimed at obtaining testimonial evidence against the accused.”
State v. Tsosie  ·  2022-07-14  ·  New Mexico Supreme Court  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common sense that the relationship between a student and his teacher is very different from that between a citizen and the police. We do not ignore that reality.”
State v. Tsosie  ·  2022-07-14  ·  New Mexico Supreme Court  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common 5 sense that the relationship between a student and his teacher is very different from 6 that between a citizen and the police. We do not ignore that reality.”
State v. Ford  ·  2021-09-03  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“A formal station-house interrogation * * * is more likely to provoke testimonial statements, while less formal questioning is less likely to reflect a primary purpose aimed at obtaining testimonial evidence against the accused.”
State v. Clark  ·  2021-08-12  ·  Ohio Court of Appeals  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“Clark III”
State v. Freeman  ·  2021-01-19  ·  Court of Appeals of Arizona  ·  pin 576 U.S. at 237
“It is common sense that the relationship . . . is very different from that between a citizen and the police.”