State v. Walsh  ·  2025-06-05  ·  Oregon Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 287 Or. at 499

“It has long been the rule in this court that we will not address arguments that were not raised in the Court of Appeals.”

State v. Walsh  ·  2025-06-05  ·  Oregon Supreme Court  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 287 Or. at 499

“It has long been the rule in this court that we will not address arguments that were not raised in the Court of Appeals.”

State v. Raygosa  ·  2022-06-08  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  pin 352 Or. at 499

“Although there was arguably sufficient evidence from which the jury could have made that deter- mination, it did not do so either expressly or by necessary implication in rendering its verdict.”

State v. Hendricks  ·  2015-08-19  ·  Court of Appeals of Oregon  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 287 Or. at 499

“[I]t would he fundamentally unfair *** to sustain defendant’s conviction on a separate factual and legal theory that has been proffered by the state for the first time on appeal.”