People of Michigan v. Terra Lee Haveman  ·  2019-05-30  ·  Michigan Court of Appeals  ·  pin 473 Mich. at 418

“In -4- interpreting a statute in which the Legislature has not expressly included language indicating that fault is a necessary element of a crime, this Court must focus on whether the Legislature nevertheless intended to require some fault as a predicate to finding guilt.”

Francis v. People  ·  2012-02-28  ·  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands  ·  pin 473 Mich. at 418

“The standard by which to gauge whether an intervening cause supersedes, and thus severs the causal link, is generally one of reasonable foreseeability.”

Stone v. Williamson  ·  2008-07-23  ·  Michigan Supreme Court  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 473 Mich. at 418

"When interpreting a statute, it is the court's duty to give effect to the intent of the Legislature as expressed in the actual language used in the statute."