Cases pin-citing Newell
State v. Newell · 2006 · 7 pinpoint citations from 7 cases, 4 distinct passages.
State of Arizona v. Edward Littleton McCauley
· 2026-05-15 · Arizona Supreme Court · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“We presume that the jurors followed the court’s instructions.”
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong
· 2024-09-03 · Arizona Supreme Court · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“We presume that the jurors followed the court’s instructions.”
State of Arizona v. David James Yonkman
· 2013-11-20 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“If a reasonable officer in the circumstances would have understood only that the defendant might want an attorney, then questioning need not cease.”
Commonwealth v. Rushing
· 2013-06-28 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“Appeals to religion do not render confessions involuntary unless they lead to the suspect’s will being overborne.”
State v. Saint
· 2008-09-09 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“Appeals to religion do not render confessions involuntary unless they lead to the suspect’s will being overborne.”
Bible v. Schriro
· 2007-07-26 · D. Arizona · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“We do not require a nexus between the mitigating factors and the crime to be established before we consider the mitigation evidence.”
Jones v. Schriro
· 2006-08-29 · D. Arizona · pin 212 Ariz. at 389
“We do not require a nexus between the mitigating factors and the crime to be established before we consider the mitigation evidence.”