Topic: there is no question that exhaustion is mandatory under the… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #100

10 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 200 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jones v. Bock.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Jones v. Bock Anchor
scotus · 2007
green “there is no question that exhaustion is mandatory under the plra and that unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.” 106
2 Turner v. Burnside
ca11 · 2008
green “this process is analogous to judgment on the pleadings under federal rule of civil procedure 12(c).” 21
3 JerMichael Pearson v. Warden Cedric Taylor
ca11 · 2016
green “at the second step, the court permitted to make factual findings to resolve the issue of exhaustion.” 21
4 Rhonda Fleming v. Warden of FCI Tallahassee
ca11 · 2015
green “2241's exhaustion requirement was judicially imposed, not congressionally mandated, and . . . nothing in the statute itself support the conclusion that the requirement jurisdictional.” 13
5 Goebert v. Lee County
ca11 · 2007
green “a remedy has to be available before it must be exhausted, and to be 'available' a remedy must be 'capable of use for the accomplishment of its purpose.” 11
6 Jones v. Zenk
gand · 2007
green “he exceptions recognized in mccarthy, including the futility exception, apply to the exhaustion requirement in 2241 cases.” 8
7 George Walter Presley v. Lt. LaTonya Scott
ca11 · 2017
green “it is the defendant's burden to prove a plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, which requires evidence that the administrative remedies are available to the plaintiff.” 7
8 Ivory S. Glenn v. M. Smith
ca11 · 2017
green “f there are disputed factual issues, the court must allow the parties to develop the record . . . .” 7
9 Reeb v. Thomas
ca9 · 2011
green “to find that prisoners can bring habeas petitions under 28 u.s.c. 2241 to challenge the bop's discretionary determinations made pursuant to would be inconsistent with the language of 18 u.s.c. 3625 .” 3
10 Shawn Wayne Whatley v. Ware SP Warden
ca11 · 2018
green “to exhaust administrative remedies under the georgia department of corrections standard operating procedures ("sop"), inmates must follow the . . . prison grievance process outlined in sop iib05-0001.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check