6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Hanna.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Hanna Anchor | green | “the interpretation of a statute or an ordinance is a purely legal matter and is subject to de novo review.” | 7 |
| 2 | CARIBBEAN CONSERV. CORP., INC. v. Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n | green | “the interpretation of a statute or an ordinance is a purely legal matter and is subject to de novo review.” | 6 |
| 3 | City of Coral Gables v. Wood | green | “a zoning ordinance will be upheld unless it is clearly shown that it has no foundation in reason and is a mere arbitrary exercise of power without reference to public health, morals, safety or welfare.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. JP | green | “to withstand strict scrutiny, a law must be necessary to promote a compelling governmental interest and must be narrowly tailored to advance that interest.” | 4 |
| 5 | Campbell v. Monroe County | green | “we agree that a florida county may enforce zoning requirements which primarily regulate aesthetic appearances.” | 4 |
| 6 | United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Metuchen | green | “there are areas in which aesthetics and economics coalesce, areas in which a discordant sight is as hard an economic fact as an annoying odor or sound.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.