Topic: imposition of a legal duty on a retailer on the basis of it… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1010

8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buczkowski v. McKay.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Buczkowski v. McKay Anchor
mich · 1992
green “imposition of a legal duty on a retailer on the basis of its internal policies is actually contrary to public policy. such a rule would encourage retailers to abandon all policies enacted for the protection of others in an effort to avoid future liability.” 7
2 Quijano v. United States
ca5 · 2003
green “in texas, a hospital's internal policies and bylaws may be evidence of the standard of care, but hospital rules alone do not determine the governing standard of care.” 3
3 Reed v. Granbury Hospital Corp.
texapp · 2003
green “hospital's internal policies and procedures do not, alone, determine the standard of care . . . .” 3
4 Hodge v. UMC of Puerto Rico, Inc.
prd · 1996
green “courts in the united states have almost universally held that hospital rules, regulations, and policies alone do not establish the standard of medical care in the medical community . . . .” 3
5 Wuest Ex Rel. Carver v. McKennan Hosp.
sd · 2000
green “public policy encouraging standards higher than generally employed in the community dictates that individual hospital policies are not determinative of the standard of care.” 3
6 Holmes v. Merson
mich · 1938
green “the generally accepted view is that violation of a statutory duty constitutes negligence per se.” 3
7 Van Steensburg v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospitals
conn · 1984
green “in this regard, we point out that hospital rules, regulations and policies do not themselves establish the standard of care.” 3
8 Van Steensburg v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospitals
conn · 1984
green “the failure to follow such rules and regulations is . . . evidence of negligence.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check