7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank Anchor | green | “specific provision takes precedence over a more general' one.” | 4 |
| 2 | Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services | green | “statute must, if reasonably possible, be construed in a way that will give force and effect to each of its provisions rather than render some of them meaningless.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Phoenix Business Park Ltd. Partnership | green | “he incorporation of new section 365(b)(2)(d), as interpreted by the ninth circuit, into section 1124(2)(a) squarely suggests a congressional intent directly contrary to the trust's interpretation of section 1123(d), a section added at exactly the same time.” | 4 |
| 4 | Pacifica L 51 LLC v. New Investments Inc. | green | “the fact that congress may not have foreseen all of the consequences of a statutory enactment is not a sufficient reason for refusing to give effect to its plain meaning” | 4 |
| 5 | Pacifica L 51 LLC v. New Investments Inc. | green | “the plain language of 1123(d) compels the holding that a debtor cannot nullify a preexisting obligation in a loan agreement to pay post-default interest solely by proposing a cure.” | 4 |
| 6 | Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandhu | green | “any' is a determiner that quantifies the noun it modifies.” | 4 |
| 7 | Davis v. Shah | green | “specific provision takes precedence over a more general' one.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.