2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of Highland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of Highland Anchor | green | “our 'continuing obligation' to assure that we have jurisdiction requires that we raise issues of standing and mootness sua sponte.” | 16 |
| 2 | Vickie Thorne v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack | green | “dismissal for lack of standing reflects a lack of jurisdiction, so dismissal of thorne's amended complaint should have been without prejudice.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.