7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Galloway v. Truesdell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Galloway v. Truesdell Anchor | green | “the executive power extends to the carrying out and enforcing the laws enacted by the legislature.” | 4 |
| 2 | STATE EX REL. BD. OF EQUALIZATION v. Barta | green | “because judicial review is limited to the administrative record, arguments made for the first time on judicial review are generally waived by the party raising them.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cook v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LLC | green | “hat is clear from our caselaw is that prejudice must be established in order to reverse a district court judgment; it is not presumed and is established by providing record evidence showing that, but for the error, a different result might have been reached.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Catanio | green | “we must attribute the plain meaning to a statute that is not ambiguous." (citing firestone v. state, 120 nev. 13, 16 , 83 p.3d 279, 281 (2004)); see also scalia garner, supra, at 56 ("the words of a governing text are of paramount concern . . . .” | 4 |
| 5 | Health Plan of Nevada, Inc. v. Rainbow Medical, LLC | green | “arbitrators do not exceed their powers if their interpretation of an agreement, even if erroneous, is rationally grounded in the agreement.” | 4 |
| 6 | State ex rel. State Board of Equalization v. Barta | green | “because judicial review is limited to the administrative record, arguments made for the first time on judicial review are generally waived by the party raising them.” | 4 |
| 7 | State v. Catanio | green | “we must attribute the plain meaning to a statute that is not ambiguous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.