3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mateo v. Fischer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mateo v. Fischer Anchor | green | “he receipt of letters or grievances, by itself, does not amount to personal involvement.” | 14 |
| 2 | Sonds v. ST. BARNABAS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES | green | “a difference of opinion between a prisoner and prison officials regarding medical treatment does not, as a matter of law, constitute deliberate indifference.” | 8 |
| 3 | Mateo v. Fischer | green | “courts in this circuit have said that the receipt of letters or grievances, by itself, does not amount to personal involvement.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.