3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anderson v. District Board Of Trustees Of Central Florida Community College.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson v. District Board Of Trustees Of Central Florida Community College Anchor | green | “experience teaches that, unless cases are pled clearly and precisely, issues are not joined, discovery is not controlled, the trial court's docket becomes unmanageable, the litigants suffer, and society loses confidence in the court's ability to administer justice.” | 18 |
| 2 | Cramer v. State of Florida | green | “hotgun complaints . . . are altogether unacceptable.” | 4 |
| 3 | Sledge v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd. | green | “the failure of the plaintiff to identify his claims with sufficient clarity to enable the defendant to frame a responsi pleading constitutes shotgun pleading.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.