Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 1,938 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas v. Arn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas v. Arn Anchor | green | “does not preclude further review by the district judge sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” | 846 |
| 2 | Thomas v. Arn | green | “there is no indication that congress, in enacting the act, intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate's report to which no objections are filed.” | 759 |
| 3 | William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of Corrections | green | “futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of a motion for leave to amend.” | 216 |
| 4 | Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc. | green | “leave to amend need not be given if a complaint, as amended, is subject to dismissal.” | 92 |
| 5 | JOSÉ VÉLEZ-PADRO v. THERMO KING DE PUERTO RICO, INC. | green | “conclusory objections that do not direct the reviewing court to the issues in controversy do not comply with rule 72(b)” | 25 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.